Current Phase Angle: Setting to 0 Degrees?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 9K views
redsealelectron
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We are working with phasors and R-L-C circuits. Here is some given data:

Vsource = 120 Volts, 60 Hz
Resistor = 100[tex]\Omega[/tex]
Capacitor = 50[tex]\mu[/tex]F
Inductor = 0.2 H
Inductor Resistance = 10[tex]\Omega[/tex]

My question is this, when solving for current using V = IZ, can you set your current phase angle to 0 degrees?

As there was no angle associated with the source, I did I = (120V [tex]\angle[/tex]0 degrees)/(112.2[tex]\Omega[/tex][tex]\angle[/tex]11.49 degrees)

You get 1.07 A[tex]\angle[/tex]-11.49 degrees

My instructor is saying we can set the angle of the current to zero because it is the only common thing in the circuit. Therefore the angle on the source is 11.49 Degrees, Not -11.49.

Can you do this? He doesn't really elaborate on the reasoning behind this. He just says they are all the same, I just need alittle more explenation is all.

Homework Equations



Using V = IZ

Solving for I, I = V / Z

The Attempt at a Solution


 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about it in real life. The only thing that matters when you're measuing a circuit is the phase difference between the current and voltage; really they have no phase, by themselves.
 
redsealelectron said:

My instructor is saying we can set the angle of the current to zero because it is the only common thing in the circuit. Therefore the angle on the source is 11.49 Degrees, Not -11.49.

Can you do this? He doesn't really elaborate on the reasoning behind this. He just says they are all the same, I just need alittle more explenation is all.


I think it's helpful to realize that what are called two-terminal
circuit elements (R, L, and C are the fundamental components)
*enforce* a relationship between voltage and current. The voltage
*across* a component and the current *through* it are not independent.
It is what two-terminal components do; they establish a relationship
between voltage and current, *for that component only*.

So, if some two-terminal circuit elements are in series, the
current in each of them *must* be identical. If they are in parallel,
the voltage seen (applied across) by each of them *must* be identical.

Thus, if they are in series, the currents must be the same and
*only* the voltages across each can be different. If they are in
parallel, only the *currents* in each can be different; the voltage
seen by each is the same.

For components in series, since the current in all of them is the
same, it makes sense to use current as a reference, and speak of the
phase of the voltages *across* (not to ground) each component with
respect to the current through all of them.

For components in parallel, it is appropriate to use the voltage
*across* them as the reference since this is the same for all of them,
and speak of the phase of the current
in each with respect to the voltage across all of them.
 
You can do it either way. What you have assumed is the more common approach that I have seen. When you take advanced classes ofPower transmission, you will often start our with V angle 0 as the current is generally unknown in power transmission and that's what you have to find out.

Since you cannot 100% say that the angle of either voltage or current is exaclt x degrees, you only have the option to find out which is lagging/leading the other. If V lags I then your answer for current will be x degrees greater than the angle for voltage and vice versa (with this idea clear, you can start off with even V angle -23.1254987 degrees. I hope you get my point.)