Curve fitting of summed normal distributions

exmachina
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a dataset of a random variable whose probability density function can be fitted/modelled as a sum of N probability density functions of normal distributions:

<br /> F_X(x) = p(\mu_1,\sigma_1^2)+p(\mu_2,\sigma_2^2)+\ldots+p({\mu}_x,\sigma_x^2)<br />

I am interested in a fitting method can robustly determine the values of \mu_1,\sigma_1,\mu_2,\sigma_2, etc

Note this is NOT convolution of normal distributions.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
These folks have put a lot of time and thought into your problem

http://www.sigmaplot.com/products/peakfit/peakfit.php

and they have free 30 day trial evaluations.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Interesting, any idea what method they use? Expectation-Maximization?
 
Edit: I guess in particular, this is the equation I'm trying to maximize, given an input vector:<br /> X = (x_1,x_2,...,x_n)<br />

Maximize:

<br /> \begin{equation}<br /> \prod_{j=1}^n\sum_{i=1}^k \frac{p_i}{\sqrt{2\pi} \sigma_i} \exp(-\frac{(x_j-\mu_i)^2}{2\sigma_i^2})<br /> <br /> Edit: I found a nice paper tackling this exact problem using EM.<br /> \end{equation}<br />

Subject to \sum_{i=1}^{k} p_i = 1

When I say maximize, I mean to find the model parameters \mu_i, \sigma_i, p_i
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top