Cyclotron Motion: Does Charge Require Energy to Move?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kolahal Bhattacharya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cyclotron Motion
AI Thread Summary
In cyclotron motion, a charged particle moves in a magnetic field with the relationship qvB = mv^2/R. Initially, energy is required to set the charge in motion, but once in motion, the magnetic field does not do work, leading to constant velocity and energy if radiation is neglected. The Lorentz force is not conservative, as it does not perform work on the charge. To initiate motion, charges must be accelerated using an electric field before entering the magnetic field. Modern accelerators utilize alternating segments of acceleration and bending to maintain constant orbit radius while increasing momentum.
Kolahal Bhattacharya
Messages
133
Reaction score
1
We know in a cyclotron motion, qvB=mv^2/R
Can you please tell me if the charge requires energy as it moves...
It is obvious that when it starts it requires energy provided by only the magnetic field. As it starts, it has constant velocity...no dissipation.Does it mean its energy remains constant?Then is Lorentz force is conservative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The B field does no work on a moving charge.
The particle would circle at constant speed and energy if radiation is neglected.
 
If B field does not do any work,how the charge sets into motion?
 
Kolahal Bhattacharya said:
If B field does not do any work,how the charge sets into motion?

One must set the charge in motion by some means other than the B field. For example, one can accelerate the charges along a straignt line in an electric field and then "inject" the beam into the B field.

Or, while the charges are circulating in the B field, they can pass through short accelerating segments that produce an electric field. As the particles gain momentum, one increases the B field in step so as to keep the radius of the orbit constant. A modern large ring-accelerator like the ones at CERN and Fermilab has alternating accelerating and bending segments.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top