Cylindrical rod velocity profile

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the velocity profile of a viscous fluid in cylindrical geometries, specifically addressing the derivation of the velocity distribution between coaxial cylinders and concentric spheres. Key equations include the no-slip boundary condition and the Navier-Stokes equation, which dictate that velocity is a function of radial position (r) and angular position (θ) due to symmetry in the system. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding flow direction and pressure distribution without relying on intuition, advocating for a systematic approach based on geometry and boundary conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Navier-Stokes equations for fluid dynamics
  • Familiarity with the no-slip boundary condition in fluid mechanics
  • Knowledge of cylindrical coordinate systems and their applications
  • Basic principles of tensor analysis as applied in fluid mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of velocity profiles in cylindrical coordinates using the Navier-Stokes equations
  • Learn about the implications of the no-slip boundary condition in various fluid flow scenarios
  • Explore tensor analysis techniques relevant to fluid dynamics
  • Investigate the effects of symmetry on fluid flow in different geometrical configurations
USEFUL FOR

Fluid mechanics students, mechanical engineers, and researchers in fluid dynamics seeking to deepen their understanding of velocity profiles and pressure distributions in cylindrical systems.

williamcarter
Messages
153
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


cylindrical rod.JPG

Homework Equations


0=viscous forces
0=in-out+sum of forces(0)
2*pi*r*L*τrz evaluated at r-2*pi*r*L*τrz evaluated at r+ΔR (eq1)

Dividing by volume and taking limit as δr->0 in eq1 I get :

(δτrz)/(δr) =0

My question is, how did they in solution got
(rδτrz)/(δr) =0, how do they have that additional r in the numerator?

The Attempt at a Solution



cylindrical rod 2.JPG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My question is: how did they in solution got (rδτrz)/(δr) =0, how do they have that additional r in the numerator?

Because when dividing by volume and taking limit as Δr->0 I get (δτrz)/(δr) =0, so my solution is lacking that r in the numerator, compared with theirs, but why, what is wrong?
 
Suppose they wrote the force balance equation the way it should have been written, as
$$2\pi rL [\tau_{rz}]_r-2\pi (r+\Delta r)L [\tau_{rz}]_{r+\Delta r}=0$$
Would this make any more sense to you?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: williamcarter
Chestermiller said:
Suppose they wrote the force balance equation the way it should have been written, as
$$2\pi rL [\tau_{rz}]_r-2\pi (r+\Delta r)L [\tau_{rz}]_{r+\Delta r}=0$$
Would this make any more sense to you?
Thank you.

I know that in order to determine the surface, the axis needs to be perpendicular to the plane.

Can you also tell me how to determine the flow direction in a cylinder or sphere?What is the criteria?

And also how to determine the pressure direction in cylinder or sphere?What is the criteria?

I do not want to go by intuition, I want to understand how to identify the flow direction and pressure direction.
 
williamcarter said:
Thank you.

I know that in order to determine the surface, the axis needs to be perpendicular to the plane.

Can you also tell me how to determine the flow direction in a cylinder or sphere?What is the criteria?

And also how to determine the pressure direction in cylinder or sphere?What is the criteria?

I do not want to go by intuition, I want to understand how to identify the flow direction and pressure direction.
I don't understand these questions. Can you discuss in terms of a specific situation?

By the way, with regard to our other thread on a film sliding down an inclined plane, I see that you are using BSL. I was trying to teach you a little very useful and simple tensor analysis in that thread (starting with the little trick I showed you), but the material I was going to cover is all done very nicely in Appendix A3 of BSL. Please read over this appendix, and get back to me with questions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: williamcarter
Chestermiller said:
I don't understand these questions. Can you discuss in terms of a specific situation?

By the way, with regard to our other thread on a film sliding down an inclined plane, I see that you are using BSL. I was trying to teach you a little very useful and simple tensor analysis in that thread (starting with the little trick I showed you), but the material I was going to cover is all done very nicely in Appendix A3 of BSL. Please read over this appendix, and get back to me with questions.

Thank you for your reply.

In the below picture(Fig1) it is pretty much intuitive that the flow will be on y surface in x direction, and that P(y).
Capture.JPG

fig1-illustrates falling film

However in the following pictures, how does he know that the velocity and pressure is like that(please see the highlighted text)

Capture2.JPG

fig2-illustrates The space between two coaxial cylinders is filled with an incompressible fluid at constant temperature. The radii of the inner and outer wetted surfaces are κR and R, respectively. The angular velocities of rotation of the inner and outer cylinders are Ωi and Ωo. Determine the velocity distribution in the fluid and the torques on the two cylinders needed to maintain the motion

Capture3.JPG

fig3-illustrating A very viscous Newtonian fluid flows in the space between two concentric spheres (as shown in Figure 2). It is desired to find the rate of flow in the system as a function of the imposed pressure difference. Neglect end effects and postulate that vθ depends only on r and θ with the other velocity components zero.

Capture4.JPG

fig4-is the solution for fig3

For example in fig 4(above) how did they know the velocity is Vθ and that it depends on r and θ?

I know that by using continuity equation we can show that velocity does not depend on a specific direction.

I also know how to define and find the surfaces because the axis needs to be perpendicular on the plane.Take the cube in fig1 for example, the x surface corresponds to the left hand side square, y surface corresponds to the top square of the cube, and z surface goes into the board.

I want to understand and deduce how the velocity and pressure are acting on different surfaces and directions, without guessing, or without intuition.How did they knew that is like that(the yellow highlighted information)?What are the criterias?
 
Last edited:
williamcarter said:
Thank you for your reply.

In the below picture(Fig1) it is pretty much intuitive that the flow will be on y surface in x direction, and that P(y).View attachment 130258
fig1-illustrates falling film
The pressure is a function of y by applying the NS equation (or the equation of motion) in the y direction.
However in the following pictures, how does he know that the velocity and pressure is like that(please see the highlighted text)

View attachment 130259
fig2-illustrates The space between two coaxial cylinders is filled with an incompressible fluid at constant temperature. The radii of the inner and outer wetted surfaces are κR and R, respectively. The angular velocities of rotation of the inner and outer cylinders are Ωi and Ωo. Determine the velocity distribution in the fluid and the torques on the two cylinders needed to maintain the motion
The first equations follow from the no-slip boundary condition. The condition that V is a function only of r follows from symmetry.
View attachment 130260
fig3-illustrating A very viscous Newtonian fluid flows in the space between two concentric spheres (as shown in Figure 2). It is desired to find the rate of flow in the system as a function of the imposed pressure difference. Neglect end effects and postulate that vθ depends only on r and θ with the other velocity components zero.
It follows from symmetry.
View attachment 130261
fig4-is the solution for fig3

For example in fig 4(above) how did they know the velocity is Vθ and that it depends on r and θ?
The latitudinal velocity being a function independent of longitude follows from symmetry.
I know that by using continuity equation we can show that velocity does not depend on a specific direction.

I also know how to define and find the surfaces because the axis needs to be perpendicular on the plane.Take the cube in fig1 for example, the x surface corresponds to the left hand side square, y surface corresponds to the top square of the cube, and z surface goes into the board.

I want to understand and deduce how the velocity and pressure are acting on different surfaces and directions, without guessing, or without intuition.
Step 1. Consider the symmetry
Step 2. Write down the equation of motion for a direction perpendicular to what you think is the main direction of flow. This can give you information about the velocity in that direction and how the pressure varies.
Step 3. Consider that at the interface between two media, the components of the stress vector (or, equivalently, the momentum flux) are continuous. If the free surface is air, then the stress vector is zero and the momentum flux is zero.
Step 4. Gain experience doing lots of problems. You'll get the idea.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: williamcarter
Chestermiller said:
The pressure is a function of y by applying the NS equation (or the equation of motion) in the y direction.

The first equations follow from the no-slip boundary condition. The condition that V is a function only of r follows from symmetry.

It follows from symmetry.

The latitudinal velocity being a function independent of longitude follows from symmetry.

Step 1. Consider the symmetry
Step 2. Write down the equation of motion for a direction perpendicular to what you think is the main direction of flow. This can give you information about the velocity in that direction and how the pressure varies.
Step 3. Consider that at the interface between two media, the components of the stress vector (or, equivalently, the momentum flux) are continuous. If the free surface is air, then the stress vector is zero and the momentum flux is zero.
Step 4. Gain experience doing lots of problems. You'll get the idea.
Thank you fir your reply!

I know that the no slip boundary condition implies that the velocity at the wall=0.

I will follow your recipe, but I do not understand what you mean by symmetry?Can you explain it in detail please? Or give some examples on this term(symmetry)?
 
Chestermiller said:
The pressure is a function of y by applying the NS equation (or the equation of motion) in the y direction.

Furthermore, could you please tell me how you know(what is the criteria) that is on y direction and not on x or z ?
 
  • #10
williamcarter said:
Thank you fir your reply!

I know that the no slip boundary condition implies that the velocity at the wall=0.

I will follow your recipe, but I do not understand what you mean by symmetry?Can you explain it in detail please? Or give some examples on this term(symmetry)?
In the concentric rotating cylinders example, the geometry is the same at all values of ##\theta##. So symmetry means, "how does the fluid know what value of ##\theta## it is at? The flow has to be the same at all values of ##\theta##.

In the concentric spheres example, the geometry is the same at all values of longitude. So symmetry means, "how doe the fluid know what longitude it is at." The flow has to be the same at all values of longitude.
 
  • #11
williamcarter said:
Furthermore, could you please tell me how you know(what is the criteria) that is on y direction and not on x or z ?
The geometry is exactly the same at all values of x and z. so how does the fluid know which way to vary with x and z? The velocity in the y direction must be zero, or the fluid would flow through the wall. The flow in the z direction is zero, because the fluid would not know which way to go. If the velocity is zero in the y direction, from the NS equation in the y direction, ##\frac{dp}{dy}=\rho g_y ##, subject to the boundary condition ##p=p_{air}## at y = 0.
 
  • #12
Chestermiller said:
In the concentric rotating cylinders example, the geometry is the same at all values of ##\theta##. So symmetry means, "how does the fluid know what value of ##\theta## it is at? The flow has to be the same at all values of ##\theta##.

In the concentric spheres example, the geometry is the same at all values of longitude. So symmetry means, "how doe the fluid know what longitude it is at." The flow has to be the same at all values of longitude.

I still did not fully understood it.

Does this mean that we can identify the velocity profile direction just by observing where the geometry is the same?
 
  • #13
williamcarter said:
I still did not fully understood it.

Does this mean that we can identify the velocity profile direction just by observing where the geometry is the same?
I don't know how to explain it any better. Just put yourself in the place of the fluid, and ask yourself which way you would flow.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K