Dangling block attached to rotating block

  • Thread starter Thread starter tnedde
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Rotating
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of two blocks connected by a string, where one block rotates on a table and the other hangs below. The original question involves determining the work required to move the dangling block down a distance d to reach a new static equilibrium. It is concluded that the original equilibrium is unstable, meaning that if the block is nudged, it will not return to its original position but instead enter a different orbit. The conversation also explores the concept of doing positive work by either pulling the block down or pushing it up, despite the block's tendency to move back to a different position after any force is applied. Ultimately, the dynamics of the system highlight the complexities of equilibrium and motion in this scenario.
tnedde
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I’m an applied math grad student and I wanted to check my conceptual understanding of what I thought was a basic mechanics problem. You have two blocks connected by a weightless, frictionless string passing through a tiny hole in a table. On the table, one block (mass m) rotates without friction about the hole, while the other (mass M) dangles below the hole. The dangling block is at rest.

The original question was: How much work does it take to move the dangling block down a distance d (presumably to a new static equilibrium)? However, if my current understanding is correct, it would be impossible for it to reach a new equilibrium on its own, because the original equilibrium is unstable. As soon as you nudge the dangling block, it should accelerate over time. So the least you could do would be to hold up the block to maintain the equilibrium, but of course this would involve doing negative work to slow it down (the textbook's solution gives a positive answer, which is where the difficulty first started for me).

Does this seem correct? I’m happy to share my reasoning, but I’m curious to have someone else take a crack at it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you release the block again it will move to a different position (not the original one and not the one where you released it).
tnedde said:
because the original equilibrium is unstable.
The original equilibrium should be stable.
 
According to my calc, because of conservation of angular momentum, the centrifugal force will be proportional to ##r^{-3}##. That enables us to do work in the following ways:

1. Pull the dangling block down. Resistance will be encountered and as soon as we stop pulling, it will start moving back up, because the upwards force is more than the block's weight. But we can measure the work done while we were pulling down. It's easiest to imagine this if we pull very slowly, so we can ignore any downwards momentum and associated kinetic energy of the dangling block when we stop pulling.

2. Push the dangling block up. Again we do this very slowly so we can ignore the dangling block's momentum and KE. As soon as we stop pushing, the block will start to move back down, as the centrifugal force will be less than the block's weight. But again we can measure the work done while pushing the block up.

In both cases we will have done positive work.
 
mfb said:
If you release the block again it will move to a different position (not the original one and not the one where you released it).
Do you think so? I would have though that it would return towards the equilibrium position, overshoot because of its momentum and then enter a (probably non-simple) harmonic motion about that position. But I haven't done any calcs.
 
Hmm right, "position" is not the right word. It will enter a different orbit.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top