DB loss for a 3GHZ EM wave traveling through 2 meters of a medium

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the dB loss for a 3GHz electromagnetic (EM) wave traveling through a medium with a permittivity of ϵ=1.5ϵ_0 and a loss tangent of 9E-4 over a distance of 2 meters. The initial attempt at a solution yielded an incorrect value of approximately 6*10^6 dB loss. Participants emphasized the relationship between wave number (k) and frequency, noting that EM loss is proportional to k. The loss tangent was identified as a critical factor in determining the dB loss.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave propagation
  • Familiarity with decibel (dB) calculations
  • Knowledge of permittivity and loss tangent concepts
  • Basic grasp of wave number (k) and its relation to frequency
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the formula for calculating dB loss in dielectric materials
  • Study the relationship between wave number (k) and frequency in electromagnetic theory
  • Explore the impact of loss tangent on signal attenuation in various media
  • Review practical examples of EM wave propagation in different materials
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physicists, and students studying electromagnetic theory who are interested in understanding signal loss in various media.

KingNothing
Messages
880
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


What is the dB loss for a 3GHZ EM wave traveling through 2 meters of a medium with ϵ=1.5ϵ_0 and loss tangent = 9E-4?

Homework Equations


Umm...I'm actually not sure. I can't find anything really relating these things at all.


The Attempt at a Solution


My first attempt involved a decibel loss of about 6*10^6, so that can't be anywhere close to right. Every equation I see shows the wave number k being proportional to the frequency, and the EM loss being proportional to k.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KingNothing said:

Homework Statement


What is the dB loss for a 3GHZ EM wave traveling through 2 meters of a medium with ϵ=1.5ϵ_0 and loss tangent = 9E-4?

Homework Equations


Umm...I'm actually not sure. I can't find anything really relating these things at all.


The Attempt at a Solution


My first attempt involved a decibel loss of about 6*10^6, so that can't be anywhere close to right. Every equation I see shows the wave number k being proportional to the frequency, and the EM loss being proportional to k.

I think wikipedia's page on Loss Tangent will help you out:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loss_tangent

.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K