DC motor turning at constant speed eventually

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a DC motor turning at constant speed, focusing on the concepts of induced forces, induced currents, and the relationship between applied torque and motor effect torque. Participants explore the dynamics of the motor's operation, including the effects of induced electromotive force (emf) and the conditions under which the motor reaches a steady state.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the relationship between induced force and induced current in a DC motor, suggesting that the induced current opposes the battery current, leading to a decrease in net current.
  • Another participant critiques the terminology used, suggesting that 'motor effect force' or 'Lorentz force' is more appropriate than 'induced force', and emphasizes the importance of considering the change in magnetic flux rather than multiple currents.
  • A later reply draws a parallel between the behavior of a DC motor and an AC generator, questioning whether the induced emf behaves similarly to the motor effect force in terms of reaching a constant speed.
  • One participant presents a governing equation for the motor's behavior, indicating that the motor will reach a speed where the applied torque balances the motor effect torque, and provides a mathematical expression for the angular velocity over time.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the term 'induced emf' in the context of the AC generator, prompting a clarification that the previous statement was incorrect.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit some agreement on the general principles of motor operation, but there are competing views regarding the terminology and the interpretation of induced forces and currents. The discussion remains unresolved on certain technical aspects and definitions.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about torque application and the definitions of terms like 'induced current' and 'induced emf', which may affect the clarity of the arguments presented.

sgstudent
Messages
726
Reaction score
3
Hi, I have a question related to the DC motor that i hope you geniuses can help me with.

By Fleming's Left hand rule, there is an induced forced (IF in diagram) at the downwards position at the armature AB. Thus, by Fleming's Right hand rule there is an induced current (IC in diagram) which opposes the current that is supplied by the battery (C in the diagram). As the induced force is directly proportional to the 'net' current flowing through AB, the induced force slowly decreases. This is because the induced current will keep increasing since there is a net moment about P which means there is an angular acceleration. After a while, there will be no more net moment as the induced current keeps on increasing which in turn causes the induced force to decrease. Since net moment about P=IF*l-friction*l, so IF*l >0 hence, the induced current is always lesser than the current supplied by the battery. This causes the 'net' current flowing across the circuit to be smaller than the inital current when the induced current in the opposite direction has not increased yet.

The image: http://i.imgur.com/2pkmq.png

Is this correct? Thanks for the help :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the right idea. Here are some nitpicks:
• 'Induced force' isn't the usual term. More usual names would be 'motor effect force' or '(magnetic) Lorentz force'.
• It's more usual in Physics to think of a single current in the coil, not a battery current and an induced current flowing in opposite directions at the same time (which, though no doubt mathematically equivalent, isn't what's going on). Instead, we consider that, as it moves, the magnetic flux linked with the coil changes, inducing an opposing emf of magnitude εind. The net emf in the circuit is therefore (εbatt – εind). Thus the current in the coil is (εbatt – εind)/R.
• Ideally, before your third sentence, you'd explain that because the coil is acted upon by the force (strictly by a combination of two such forces, giving a torque) it rotates faster and faster, increasing εind), and so decreasing the current.
Sorry – I've just re-read your fourth sentence, which says pretty much the same thing, though, as I've explained, I think you should keep off 'induced current'.
 
Hi Mr Wood :smile: thanks for the help, I'll take note of the mistakes. That being said, will this be similar to the AC generator whereby instead of the induced emf, there is a motor effect force that opposes your hand motion. So eventually, the hand turns with constant speed. That bing said, will the induced emf's peak voltage increase at a decreasing rate until it stabilises? Thanks for the help :smile:
 
Edited (in fact rewritten so it makes some sense – I hope)...

The opposing (motor effect) torque is proportional to the speed of turning, if the motor coil is in a circuit of constant resistance, R. So for a fixed applied torque, the motor will indeed reach a speed at which (applied torque – motor effect torque) just balances the frictional torque. If we neglect the frictional torque then the governing equation is
G_{app} - G_{mot} = I\frac{d\omega}{dt}
in which I is the moment of inertial of the rotating assembly, and ω is its angular velocity.

If we assume that the B field is radial then G_{mot} = {K\omega}

in which, we can show, K = \frac{(BAn)^2}{R}

Thus G_{app} - K\omega = I\frac{d\omega}{dt}

As you can check by substitution, the solution to this (assuming ω=0 at t=0) is
\omega = \left(\frac{G_{app}}{K}\right)\left[1 - exp\left(\frac{-Kt}{I}\right)\right].
Thus ω approaches a final speed, more and more slowly, just as you say.
The final speed is \omega = \left(\frac{G_{app}}{K}\right)
But note: you won't necessarily apply a constant torque with your hand.
 
Last edited:
Hi Mr Wood, I'm not very sure what you mean by εind because in the AC generator won't there be a motor effect force rather than a induced emf? Thanks again for the help! :smile:
 
sgstudent: You're absolutely right not to be sure what I meant: it was rubbish. I'm editing it!
 
haha thanks for the help Mr Wood! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
7K
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K