De Broglie wavelength in terms of accelerated potential difference

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the de Broglie wavelength formula for an electron accelerated through a potential difference V. The correct formula is established as λ = 12.27[V( (eV)/(2m₀c²) + 1)]⁻¹/². The initial incorrect approach involved using classical kinetic energy, leading to λ = 12.27Å/√V. The solution requires incorporating relativistic effects, specifically using the relationship between momentum and energy in relativistic physics, ultimately leading to λ = h/p, where p is derived from the relativistic energy-momentum relation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of de Broglie wavelength and its significance in quantum mechanics.
  • Familiarity with relativistic mechanics, including concepts of kinetic energy and momentum.
  • Knowledge of the relationship between potential difference, kinetic energy, and electron acceleration.
  • Basic grasp of the constants involved, such as Planck's constant (h) and rest mass (m₀).
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the de Broglie wavelength in the context of relativistic physics.
  • Learn about the energy-momentum relationship in special relativity, specifically the equation p²c² + m²c⁴ = E².
  • Explore the implications of using invariant mass versus relativistic mass in particle physics.
  • Investigate the Taylor series expansion of relativistic equations and its applications in classical limits.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics and special relativity, as well as educators seeking to clarify the concepts of wave-particle duality and relativistic effects on particle behavior.

Von Neumann
Messages
101
Reaction score
4
Problem:

Derive a formula expressing the de Broglie wavelength (in Å) of an electron in terms of the potential difference V (in volts) through which it is accelerated.

Solution (so far):

The textbook's answer is the following,

\lambda=12.27[V(\frac{eV}{2m_{0}c^{2}}+1)]^{-\frac{1}{2}}

I'm having some trouble getting there. I started by noting that if an electron is accelerated from rest through a potential difference V, it gains a kinetic energy

\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}=eV

So therefore,

v=\sqrt{\frac{2eV}{m}}

Since \lambda=\frac{h}{mv}

Therefore, \lambda=\frac{h}{\sqrt{2meV}}

Also, \frac{h}{\sqrt{2me}}\approx 12.27 Å

So I get, \lambda=\frac{12.27Å}{\sqrt{V}}

I don't know where I went wrong. Any suggestions?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Relativity?
 
voko said:
Relativity?

If I use the formula m=\frac{m_{0}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}}} in \lambda=\frac{h}{\sqrt{2meV}}

everything gets extremely complex and looks nothing like what the answer is supposed to look like. Can you be more specfic?
 
I think you should start by writing down the energy relativisticly.
 
voko said:
I think you should start by writing down the energy relativisticly.

\frac{m_{0}v^{2}}{2\sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}=eV

Is that what you mean?
 
In relativity, kinetic energy is T = \gamma mc^2 - mc^2. Momentum is \vec p = \gamma m \vec v, where \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}.
 
By the way, when I say m here, I mean the same thing as m_0. I don't distinguish "mass" from "relativistic mass". Most physicists don't these days. Mass is the rest mass, period. If you prefer, kinetic energy is T = \gamma m_0 c^2 - m_0 c^2 .

[Edit: by the way, if you're curious, if you take the Taylor series expansion of \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}} \right) m_0 c^2 - m_0 c^2 around v \approx 0 you'll find that it reduces to the Newtonian \frac{1}{2} m_0 v^2 for v near 0. Neato.]
 
Last edited:
collinsmark said:
By the way, when I say m here, I mean the same thing as m_0. I don't distinguish "mass" from "relativistic mass". Most physicists don't these days. Mass is the rest mass, period. If you prefer, kinetic energy is T = \gamma m_0 c^2 - m_0 c^2 .

[Edit: by the way, if you're curious, if you take the Taylor series expansion of \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}} \right) m_0 c^2 - m_0 c^2 around v \approx 0 you'll find that it reduces to the Newtonian \frac{1}{2} m_0 v^2 for v near 0. Neato.]

I have no issue with you referring to rest mass as just mass - as long as it's clear to everyone to what you are referring. Why cause unneeded ambiguity (especially in a section of the forum aimed towards students seeking help, and looking to develop good physics practices)?

As for the problem I originally asked, if anyone is interested, I obtained the required solution by the following:

Begin with (pc)^2+(E_0)^2=E^2

Solve for p and substitute the result into the de Broglie wavelength equation λ=h/p.

Next, eliminate E by introducing kinetic energy, then use the fact that K=eV.

Simplify and be sure to express the constant quantity h/sqrt(2em_0) in angstroms (≈12.27Å).

No thanks to voko or collinsmark! - Just kidding, at least you tried to help. :biggrin:
 
Also, it's interesting to note the result reduces to the equation I derived first incorrectly in the event V << c^2.
 
  • #10
My point (and I assume the same point voko was hinting toward), is "relativistic" mass is not used anymore. Instead, "invariant" mass is used, which is the same thing as the rest mass.

Kinetic energy:
T = (\gamma -1) mc^2

Total energy of the system:
E = \gamma mc^2

3-Momentum:
\vec p = \gamma m \vec v

Relationship between 3-momentum and total energy of the system:
p^2 c^2 + m^2c^4 = E^2

And the mass m is the invariant mass. If you wish to directly substitute m_0 in for m, feel free to do so.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_in_special_relativity
 
  • #11
Thanks for rewording what I already had stated!
 
  • #12
I have solved it, like this
246813
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K