The Contestant's Gamble: What is the Most Probable Outcome?

  • Thread starter robert Ihnot
  • Start date
In summary, The contestant has 6 suitcases, 2 of which are disadvantages containing large numbers, and 4 of which are advantages containing small numbers. He must choose to open two suitcases with a higher chance of facing "bad stuff" than "good stuff." Despite this, he decides to play on and ends up with a lower amount of money than he started with. It is generally advised for contestants to quit after reaching $100,000, as the odds are not in their favor. However, if the contestant were to choose three cases, the most likely outcome would be two small and one big case, with a probability of 60%.
  • #1
robert Ihnot
1,059
1
The contestant has 6 suitcases unopened. Two of them are disadvantages and contain large numbers--which would count against him. The remaining 4 contain small numbers to his advantage.

The contestant may quit, or if he chooses to go on, he must choose to open two suitcases. (It is disadvantages to pick even 1 large number out of his two choices.)

The contestant sees that four of the cases are to his advantage and only two against him, and so he decides to play on and open two cases. He remarks to the audience, "The numbers favor me!"

But do they? What is the most probable outcome?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
4*3 ways to choose both small; 4 * 2 * 2 ways to choose one small and one big; 2 * 1 ways to choose both big. Overall, it's a 40% chance for 'good stuff', 53% chance for 'bad stuff', and a 7% chance for 'very bad stuff'.
 
  • #3
In other words, yeah, the odds probably don't favor his playing.
 
  • #4
csprof2000 In other words, yeah, the odds probably don't favor his playing.

IT CERTAINLY WORKED THAT WAY! He came on with about $109,000, hit one small and one big, and the next thing I remember he left the stage with only $66,000. In other words his outcome was in the majority case, that is, the CRGreenhouse case of 53%.

I have noticed that, mostly, if the contestant can reach $100,000 he is well advised to quit, at least in my book, and those unfortunate big cases have a way of happening that might not be expected, at least if we go individually case by case.

If we went further with this and supposed he did three cases, we would have (4/6)(3/5)(2/4) = 24/120 = 20% probability of winning all three. Yet the contestant, we know, had a individual chance of 50% to 67% in all three cases.

The most likely outcome in three cases would be to hit two small and one big = 60%. The other case of two big and one small would be the remaining 20%.
 
Last edited:

1. What is the purpose of "The Contestant's Gamble?"

The purpose of "The Contestant's Gamble" is to explore the concept of probability and how it applies to real-life situations, specifically in the context of a game show. The book examines various strategies and theories related to probability and how they can be applied to increase one's chances of winning.

2. How does probability play a role in the game show?

Probability plays a crucial role in the game show as it determines the likelihood of a contestant winning a prize. The game show is designed with specific odds and probabilities in mind, and understanding these probabilities can help contestants make more informed decisions and increase their chances of winning.

3. Are there any mathematical formulas used in the book?

Yes, "The Contestant's Gamble" utilizes various mathematical formulas and theories to explain the concept of probability and its application in the game show. However, the book is written in an accessible and easy-to-understand manner, so no advanced mathematical knowledge is required.

4. Can the strategies in the book be applied to other real-life situations?

Yes, the strategies and theories discussed in "The Contestant's Gamble" can be applied to other real-life situations where probability plays a role. This could include decision-making in business, finance, or even everyday life situations where understanding and calculating probabilities can be advantageous.

5. Is the book suitable for readers without a background in mathematics?

Yes, "The Contestant's Gamble" is written in a way that is accessible to readers without a background in mathematics. The concepts and theories are explained in a clear and straightforward manner, making it easy for anyone to understand and apply to their own lives.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top