DeBroglie Wavelength: Proton at Room Temp Scattering Behavior

edpell
Messages
282
Reaction score
4
A proton at room temperature with an energy of 0.025eV has a deBroglie wavelength of about 1A (1E-10 meters). If we shoot two proton beams at each other with is low energy and large wavelength what happens? Do they scatter as if they are small hard particles of size about 1 fermi (1E-15 meters) or do they scatter as if they are big fuzzballs of size about 1A?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It might be instructive to consider the two protons as classical particles and find the distance of closest approach: the distance at which the Coulomb potential energy equals their total initial kinetic energy.
 
About 2A. So if we say they are each 0.7A they never interpenetrate.

Is this correct? How do we think about the distribution of a room temperature proton? Is it 100% within 1 deBroglie wavelength? Is there a tail to the distribution so we might see an effect in the scattering?
 
Check your math. I get r = about 290 Å for a potential energy of 0.05 eV (8 x 10-21 J)

$$PE = \frac{q^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r}$$
 
I think it is

$$PE = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r}$$
 
The electric potential V (in volts, in MKS units) at a distance r from a charge q is given by your formula.

When you put a second charge q2 at that location, the electric potential energy of the system (in joules, in MKS units) is given by PE = q2V. When the two charges are equal in magnitude (q2 = q) this leads to my formula.

Unfortunately, in classical electromagnetism, we usually use V to refer to potential (volts), whereas in QM we often use V to refer to potential energy (joules or electron-volts), which causes confusion.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top