Debunking Your Friend: Why Their Answer to Astronaut Pen Question is Wrong

  • Thread starter Thread starter richman614
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concept
AI Thread Summary
When an astronaut lets go of a pen in the space station, the pen does not float due to the absence of gravity, but rather because both the pen and the space station are in free-fall towards Earth. The space station is in orbit, meaning it is still within Earth's gravitational field, and the pen is falling at the same rate as the station, creating the sensation of weightlessness. This situation is analogous to being in a free-falling elevator, where objects appear to float because they are falling at the same speed as their surroundings. The orbital motion of the space station provides the necessary horizontal velocity to prevent it from crashing into Earth. Therefore, gravity is present, and the pen's behavior is a result of the dynamics of orbital mechanics.
richman614
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
i have a concept question that i can't seem to get anybody?? Know??

Lets say you and a friend are wacthing tv and see an astronaut on the space station let go of a pen while he turns to get some paper. What happens to the pen when the astronaugt let's go of it? Your friend says its because there is no gravity up there. Explain why your friend is wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is because the space station is in orbit. It is still in the gravitational field, so it is in free-fall, not zero-gravity.
 
There is gravity everywhere, the pen "floats" because it is in free-fall, similar to a skydiver as he/she plummets towards the ground. The pen is constantly falling towards Earth however because the shuttle the pen is in is orbiting the Earth it's moving fast enough to not crash into the earth. But yes there is gravity on the pen.
 
thanxs guys

thnak you so its like the shuttle cause a centrifugal force which keeps the pen up
 
richman614 said:
thnak you so its like the shuttle cause a centrifugal force which keeps the pen up

No.

It's the same as if you were in a free falling elevator and dropped a pen. You and the elevator and the pen are falling toward the earth, but to you it seems as if the pen isn't falling becasue you are falling just as fast as it.

The space station in orbit is constantly falling towards the earth, but its perpendicular velocity is such that its motion is an orbit instead of a line direct to earth.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top