Deciding Between Nanoscience & Biophysics: Advice Needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter BrightMoonlight
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the decision-making process for selecting a master's program in the fields of solid state physics, nanoscience, and biophysics. The individual is weighing two offers: one from a funded nanoscience program focused on solid state physics and another from an unfunded physics program that includes a curriculum in biophysics. The appeal of the biophysics option lies in the potential to explore neuroscience, which seems intriguing despite a lack of familiarity with the field. Concerns are raised about the deviation from a physics background, as transitioning to biophysics would involve a shift from quantum mechanics to statistical mechanics and biology. The urgency to make a decision is emphasized, with a preference for funded options due to financial considerations. The conversation highlights the uncertainty surrounding the biophysics field and its differences from traditional physics studies.
BrightMoonlight
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Up to yesterday, I have been comparing my offers (master's degree) having solid state physics/ nanophysics in mind. Since I have an offer with scholarship from a good nanoscience program, I was thinking of accepting that. My other offers are physics.
One of the physics departments which offered me admission (not funding) has a separate curriculum in biophysics for those interested/curious. I hadn't thought about it seriously before, since I had mostly concentrated on solid state physics.

I need to accept one of the offers asap, but I know little about biophysics. It's the thought of doing a PhD in neuroscience (the whole "studying the brain" thing) that seems interesting. It "sounds" interesting, but I don't know much about it. Seems it would be too much deviation from my physics background. But (some of the) people working in the field seem to have (bio)physics background.
It seems the quantum mechanics in solid state will be replaced by statistical mechanics and biology.

I have two options:
1. Choose nanoscience program. Go into solid state physics.
2. Choose the unfunded physics program. Take some courses in biophysics. In case I liked it, I could do my thesis in that. If not, I could do my thesis in solid state.

I would be grateful if anyone has any advice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would take one of the offers with funding, unless you're well off.
 
Student100 said:
I would take one of the offers with funding, unless you're well off.

Thanks for your reply.
I did the same thing. I don't know anything about how neuroscience research is. It seems like neuroscience is mostly biology, and biology is totally different from my own background.
I hope I did the right thing.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top