Deciphering Asteroid Stats to Divert an Impact on Earth

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding asteroid statistics for a physics project aimed at devising methods to divert an asteroid from impacting Earth. Key terms such as semi-major axis, eccentricity, and perihelion are explained in relation to an asteroid's orbit. It is clarified that while most planets and asteroids orbit in the same direction and plane due to their formation from a rotating disk, objects entering the solar system from elsewhere may not follow this pattern. The conversation emphasizes the importance of grasping these orbital mechanics to effectively propose diversion strategies. Understanding these concepts is crucial for the project's success.
winston2020
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
I'm currently in grade 12 physics. For my summative project in the class (which is worth a large part of my final mark) I have to think of three separate ways to divert a large asteroid away from hitting earth. We were each given a real object and stats on the object. My first problem is that I don't know what most of the stats mean :redface:

Here's a little chart:
Object a (AU) | e | i (deg) | w (deg) | node (deg) | m (deg) | q (AU) |
1981 Midas 1.78 |0.650| 39.8 | 267.7 | 357.0 | 114.0 | 0.621 |

Q (AU) | P (yr) | H (mag) | MOID (AU) | ref | class |
2.93 | 2.37 | 15.50 | 0.003330 | 62 | APO* |

Column Headings Description:
a (AU): Semi-major axis of the orbit in AU
e: Eccentricity of the orbit
i (deg): Inclination of the orbit with repsect to the ecliptic plane and the equinox of J2000 (J2000-Ecliptic) in degrees
w(deg): Argument of the perihelion in degrees
node (deg): Longitude of the ascending node in degrees
M (deg): Mean anomoly at epoch in degrees
q (AU): Perihelion distance of the orbit in AU
Q (AU): Aphelion distance of the orbit in AU
P (yr): Orbital period in Julian years
H (mag): Absolute V-magnitude
MOID (AU): Minimum orbit intersection distance(the minimum distance between the osculating orbits of the NEO and the Earth)
ref: Orbital solution reference
class: Object classification (APO="Apollo" * indicates possible threat)
(AU): Astronomical Unit: 1.0 AU is about 1.5x10^8 km

If you guys could decipher some of these for me it'd be greatly appreciated :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
en.wikipedia.org

no joke, I believe it'll have nearly every term on there, semi-major axis, eccentricity, etc.

The first two are geometric terms that define the ellipse that its orbit traces, the ecliptic plane is the plane the planets (more or less)are on, the perihelion you can look up, etc.
 
OK, thanks I've looked through those. Here's another question: Do all objects in the solar system orbit in the same direction? (i.e. An asteroid will orbit the sun clockwise, all the planets and other asteroids will also orbit clockwise)

Is that correct?
 
It's not guaranteed fact, but all the planets do. All this stuff used to be a big spinning disk that slowly coalesced into the planets, so everything part of that original pile of dust will be orbiting the same way, as the planets and asteroids in the belt do. Also in the same plane, the ecliptic plane

If an asteroid was wandering through the galaxy and got pulled in by our solar system's gravity, it might not be orbiting at all in the same plane or direction, just depending on how it approached
 
blochwave said:
It's not guaranteed fact, but all the planets do. All this stuff used to be a big spinning disk that slowly coalesced into the planets, so everything part of that original pile of dust will be orbiting the same way, as the planets and asteroids in the belt do. Also in the same plane, the ecliptic plane

If an asteroid was wandering through the galaxy and got pulled in by our solar system's gravity, it might not be orbiting at all in the same plane or direction, just depending on how it approached

Ok, thanks :D
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top