Decoding Secret Credit Card Numbers & Phone Recharge Codes

AI Thread Summary
Secret codes for recharging phone credits and credit card numbers often rely on "trap door" algorithms, which utilize the difficulty of factoring large prime numbers. While encoding is straightforward, decoding requires knowledge of the original factors and significant computational power. Cracking these codes is theoretically possible but impractical without the right factors and extensive resources. The RSA challenge highlights the complexity of this process, as demonstrated by the time and effort taken to factor large numbers. Overall, while decoding is feasible, it remains a highly challenging task.
debayan
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
how are the secret codes for recharging the credit of a phone or the secret credit card numbers gnerated? i hrd something with prime nos. any way to decode them?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I assume you are talking about "trap door" codes- where you can be told how to encode a messsage but that doesn't help you decode it. I don't know all the details but essentially it uses the fact that while it is relatively easy to multiply two large (prime) numbers together, it is almost impossible to factor the product without knowing the two factors to begin with. Yes, it is possible to decode them:
(1) Know the correct factors to begin with
(2) Use very, very powerful computer for a very, very long time.
 
Well, it can be cracked, but there's no smooth way to do it.
If there were, http://www.rsa.com/rsalabs/node.asp?id=2092 wouldn't give out $30,000 to the one who factors a number of "just" 212 decimal digits (and $200,000 for a 600+ digit number) :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"RSA-640 is factored!

The factoring research team of F. Bahr, M. Boehm, J. Franke, T. Kleinjung continued its productivity with a successful factorization of the challenge number RSA-640, reported on November 2, 2005. The factors [verified by RSA Laboratories] are:

16347336458092538484431338838650908598417836700330
92312181110852389333100104508151212118167511579

and

1900871281664822113126851573935413975471896789968
515493666638539088027103802104498957191261465571

The effort took approximately 30 2.2GHz-Opteron-CPU years according to the submitters, over five months of calendar time. (This is about half the effort for RSA-200, the 663-bit number that the team factored in 2004.)
Top of Page
"

Remember what HallsofIvy was just saying XD
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top