Deducing Irrational Identity - a1=a2 & b1=b2?

basil
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
How do you deduce that

a1 - \sqrt{N} b1 = a2 - \sqrt{N}b2

to be

a1=a2 and b1=b2?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Matching coefficients?
 
You can't: Take N = 4, a1=5, b1=1, a2=15, and b2=6
 
daveb said:
You can't: Take N = 4, a1=5, b1=1, a2=15, and b2=6

In this case, they are only equal because N is a perfect square.

If a + b√N = c + d√N, then
a - c = (d - b)√N

Assuming a, b, c, d are integers, then (a - c) is an integer, thus for equality, (d - b)√N must be an integer. This is only true if a = c and b = d, or if √N is an integer, making N a perfect square.
 
Last edited:
Hey guys,

I see now...Thanks! Appreciate it.
 
Unit said:
Assuming a, b, c, d are integers, then (a - c) is an integer, thus for equality, (d - b)√N must be an integer. This is only true if a = c and b = d, or if √N is an integer, making N a perfect square.

You skipped a step. sqrt(N) could have been rational, with (d-b) divisible by the denominator. And so this problem is reduced to proving that sqrt(N) cannot be rational for square-free N.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top