Define the complex number Z = u^v

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bruno Tolentino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Complex number
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
Bruno Tolentino
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
If I define the complex number z = r exp(i θ) how z = uv, so, how to express u and v in terms of r and θ?

u(r, θ) = ?
v(r, θ) = ?

And the inverse too:

r(u, v) = ?
θ(u, v) = ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand your question. You ask, apparently, for z in terms of "u" and "v" but have not said what "u" and "v" are! Are you referring to the representation of a complex function as "z(x+ iy)= u(x,y)+ iv(x,y)" where u and v are real valued function of the real variables x and y? If so then [itex]z= re^{i\theta}[/itex] is NOT "[itex]u^v[/itex]". [itex]z= re^{i\theta}= r(cos(\theta)+ isin(\theta)[/itex] so that [itex]u= r cos(\theta)[/itex] and [itex]v= r sin(\theta)[/itex].
 
Bruno Tolentino said:
If I define the complex number z = r exp(i θ) how z = uv, so, how to express u and v in terms of r and θ?

u(r, θ) = ?
v(r, θ) = ?

And the inverse too:

r(u, v) = ?
θ(u, v) = ?
I'm not sure what you are looking for, but [itex]u=re^{i\theta},\ v=1[/itex] works.
However there are an infinite number of possibilities, by using [itex]u=r^ne^{ni\theta}\ and\ v=\frac{1}{n}[/itex].
 
Z is a complex number, u is a real number and v is a real number too. Is just another way of express the complex numbers...

So, is possible convert the expression z = x + i y in z = uv ? Is possible express u and v in terms of x and y?
 
Bruno Tolentino said:
So, is possible convert the expression z = x + i y in z = uv ? Is possible express u and v in terms of x and y?
Well, let's try. You know that [itex]z=x+iy[/itex] can also be expressed as [itex]z=re^{i\phi}[/itex], where [itex]r=\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}}[/itex] and [itex]\phi = \arcsin(\frac{y}{r})[/itex]. Therefore, we obviously have [itex]z=e^{\ln r}\cdot e^{i\phi}= e^{\ln r + i\phi}[/itex]. ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bruno Tolentino
Yeah! I thought this... but, I was unsatisfied com this 'conversion' and so I posted my doubt here because the most experiente could see something better...

Anyway! Thank you!