Defining a thermodynamic system completely

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Urmi Roy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System Thermodynamic
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around defining a thermodynamic system and the implications of knowing internal energy as a function of various thermodynamic properties. Participants explore whether knowing internal energy or Gibbs free energy in terms of two properties is sufficient to derive all other thermodynamic quantities, especially in the context of phase fractions at the triple point of a substance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that knowing internal energy as a function of entropy and specific volume (u(s,v)) allows for the determination of all other thermodynamic properties, while others argue that this is not true if the function is expressed in terms of other variables.
  • One participant mentions that the energy of an ideal gas depends only on temperature and molar number, which does not provide a complete thermodynamic description.
  • Questions arise about the number of parameters needed to determine the fractions of phases at the triple point, with some suggesting that two molar fractions are necessary.
  • There is a discussion about whether knowing specific internal energy and specific enthalpy could allow for the determination of mole fractions, with differing views on the practicality of measuring these quantities versus molar fractions.
  • Participants discuss the equations relating specific internal energy and enthalpy to the components of a two-phase system, raising questions about the physical motivation behind such calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the sufficiency of knowing internal energy or Gibbs free energy in terms of two properties to derive all thermodynamic quantities. The discussion about the parameters needed at the triple point also reveals uncertainty, with no consensus reached on the best approach to determine phase fractions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of thermodynamic properties and the unresolved nature of how to measure certain quantities in two-phase systems.

Urmi Roy
Messages
743
Reaction score
1
So I read somewhere that if we know u(s,v) i.e. internal energy as a function of entropy and specific volume, we can find all other thermodynamics quantities on earth, like temperature, pressure, Gibb's free energy from it.

However, is this true if we have u as a function of just any two thermodynamic properties?

Also. if we know Gibb's free energy/ Helmoltz energy in terms of any 2 quantities, can we similarly find all other thermodynamic properties from it? In case there is a chemical reaction going on, then I guess we need to define 2 such parameters, right?
 
Science news on Phys.org
No, knowing internal energy as a function of other set of quantities is not as informative as knowing ##U(S,V)##.

For example, the energy of ideal gas is ##U = c_V nRT## (depends on temperature and molar number only), but from this we cannot find the equation of state ##pV = nRT##. However, from relation ##U(S,V)## we can find this equation of state. For this function, see Callen's book

Callen H.B., Thermodynamics And An Introduction To Thermostatistics, 2ed., Wiley, 1985

or the Wikipedia page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideal_gas

section "Thermodynamic Potentials" towards the end. The Gibbs energy provides complete thermodynamic description only if expressed as function of pressure and temperature (and molar numbers).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Well can I ask a question which is indirectly related to this? (I'm just trying to correlate things I've learned in this thermo course this semester...).
So the question is...at the triple point for a given pure substance, where we know the temperature and pressure, how many parameters are required to know exactly the fraction of each phase that exists? For example, if you know u(s,v), it would not be enough, right? You'd require another parameter...could that be any thermodynamic parameter?
 
Urmi Roy said:
So the question is...at the triple point for a given pure substance, where we know the temperature and pressure, how many parameters are required to know exactly the fraction of each phase that exists?
Since there are three phases, we need to know two molar fractions, for example ##\frac{n_{solid}}{n}##, ##\frac{n_{liquid}}{n}##. The third molar fraction can be derived from these two, since

$$
n_{solid} + n_{liquid} + n_{gaseous} = n.
$$

(divide by ##n## and express the third fraction).

For example, if you know u(s,v), it would not be enough, right? You'd require another parameter...could that be any thermodynamic parameter?

I'm not sure what you mean. What is u(s,v)? You mean ##U(S,V)## (total energy, entropy and volume), or ##u(s,v)## (energy, entropy and volume per mole) ?
 
Sorry for the delay in replying! I just finished my final maths exam. So I mean specific internal energy i.e. energy, entropy and volume per mole/kg. Maybe I could explain the question by going back to what you said:
Jano L. said:
Since there are three phases, we need to know two molar fractions, for example ##\frac{n_{solid}}{n}##, ##\frac{n_{liquid}}{n}##. The third molar fraction can be derived from these two, since

$$
n_{solid} + n_{liquid} + n_{gaseous} = n.
$$

(divide by ##n## and express the third fraction).

You're saying we need to know 2 mole fractions.I get that. But what if you have no way of measuring that...Wouldn't it be enough to know (as an example) the specific internal energy and specific enthalpy of the system and hence, from that knowledge (and the knowledge of the internal energy & enthalpy of each phase, from data books) determine the mole fractions?
 
Wouldn't it be enough to know (as an example) the specific internal energy and specific enthalpy of the system and hence, from that knowledge (and the knowledge of the internal energy & enthalpy of each phase, from data books) determine the mole fractions?

What do you mean by specific internal energy and enthalpy of the whole system? The quantities
$$
u = \frac{U}{N}
$$
and
$$
h = \frac{H}{N}
$$
where ##N## is the total molar number?

How would you get to know these for two-phase system? Measuring molar fractions of each phase seems so much easier.

But if we somehow knew ##u,h## for the composed system, we could solve the equations

$$
Nu = u_1N_1 + u_2 N_2
$$

$$
Nh = h_1N_1 + h_2 N_2
$$

$$
N_1 + N_2 = N
$$

(##1## for solid, ##2## for liquid) for ##N_1,N_2, N##, to get both molar fractions and even the total number of molecules.
 
Jano L. said:
What do you mean by specific internal energy and enthalpy of the whole system? The quantities
$$
u = \frac{U}{N}
$$
and
$$
h = \frac{H}{N}
$$
where ##N## is the total molar number?

How would you get to know these for two-phase system? Measuring molar fractions of each phase seems so much easier.

But if we somehow knew ##u,h## for the composed system, we could solve the equations

$$
Nu = u_1N_1 + u_2 N_2
$$

$$
Nh = h_1N_1 + h_2 N_2
$$

$$
N_1 + N_2 = N
$$

(##1## for solid, ##2## for liquid) for ##N_1,N_2, N##, to get both molar fractions and even the total number of molecules.

Yes, the definition of specific quantities is what you've mentioned at the top of your post. I'm talking about it in the perspective of problem-solving on exams...

But you've mentioned only N1 and N2 ...we were talking about the triple point, so there will be N1, N2 and N3. Still, we have 3 equations and 3 unknowns, so I suppose its ok.
 
Hm, mathematically it seems that way. But I do not see physical motivation behind such calculation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K