Defining Membership Uniqueness in a Set X with One True Value

  • Thread starter Thread starter delphi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uniqueness
delphi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello All,

I am trying to define a uniqueness of a member of a set, please bear with me as my notation is not as refined as it ought to be:

For a set X:

{ x(i) } union { f(x(j)) = true, where j is not equal to i } = { x(i) }

what I am trying to say is, for this set X there exists only one member whose evaluation with f() results in true.

I am defining this by saying that the union of any element with any other element other than itself in the set who's value is true is equal to the first element, however this doesn't quite work - I almost need a count() function on the right side and say that the count() is always = 1.

Is there a more correct elegant way to say this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you can use the "count" function. The common mathematical notation for this is |{...}| or #{...}:

\left| \{ x \in X \mid f(x) = \text{true} \} \right| = 1
\#\{ x \in X \mid f(x) = \text{true} \} = 1

Or you could use quantifiers:
\exists! x \in X: f(x) = \text{true}
(I don't know if this is official notation, with the ! meaning "unique", but I'm pretty sure any mathematician will understand it).

Or you could write this correct-but-ugly line,
\exists x \in X: \left( f(x) = \text{true} \wedge \forall y \in X: y \neq x \implies f(x) \neq \text{true} \right)
 
delphi said:
Hello All,

I'm trying to define a uniqueness of a member of a set, please bear with me as my notation is not as refined as it ought to be:

what I am trying to say is, for this set X there exists only one member whose evaluation with f() results in true.

It depends on what you mean by "uniqueness". Ir's one thing to know there's exactly one murderer in the room, and another to know which person in the room is the murderer. If you want to know who the murderer is, there needs to be some identifying property or set of properties.

This was a practical problem for me in my work. We solved the problem by creating a family of sets Ai such that each set was identified with a unique property in a way that an intersection of some of the sets contained exactly one member.
 
Last edited:
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top