Defining Poisson Brackets: Analytic Functions in Multiple Variables

AI Thread Summary
Poisson brackets can be defined for analytic functions in multiple variables by utilizing fundamental properties of these brackets. The analytic nature of the functions allows for their representation through power expansions, which can be simplified using established rules of Poisson brackets. The discussion highlights the need for resources on Taylor expansions in multiple variables, particularly for functions of two variables. Participants suggest searching for "calculus of several/many variables" and refer to Wikipedia for information on Taylor series. The conversation emphasizes the lack of specific references for combining Taylor series with Poisson brackets.
stefano colom
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
l know you can define poisson brackets between two analytic function in several variables f(q1,q2,q3,..,p1,p2,p3,..) and g (q1,q2,q3,..,p1,p2,p3,..) only by foundamental poisson brackets and their proprieties.how is it possible?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If the function is analytic, this means it is equal to its power expansion. If you substitute this Taylor expansion in the Poisson bracket you want to calculate, you can then use simple rules to simplify it (like P.B. of sum is sum of P.B. etc) to few basic P.B.s, like that for q1,p1.
 
how it is the power expansion of the function f(x,y)?
l know the power expansion of f(x), but the one of f(x,y)? can anyone tell me a website where l can find more informations about that?thank you
 
can you suggest me a site where l can find how to use taylor series with Poisson Brackets?
 
Unfortunatly I do not know any reference for this topic.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top