Definition of action of quantum hamiltonian, two state system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the term "action" of the Hamiltonian (H) on a two-state quantum system represented by orthonormal states |1> and |2>. The user seeks clarification on how to express this action mathematically, given that H is a 2x2 Hermitian matrix. There is confusion regarding the meaning of "action" in this context, indicating a need for a more detailed explanation. The user emphasizes that the Hamiltonian matrix itself has not been explicitly provided, as it is deemed unnecessary for the current inquiry. Overall, the focus is on defining and applying the concept of the Hamiltonian's action on the specified quantum states.
theidiot
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a two-state system. We denote the two orthonormal states by |1>and |2>. The Hamiltonian of the system is given by a 2 × 2 matrix:
[omitted in this post, has 4 entries of course, not very interesting]
Write the action of H on the states |1> and |2>.

2. The attempt at a solution

Well, I don't know what is meant by action here! No doubt it's simple but I need to know what 'action' means in this context. Thanks for assistance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just to clarify, 'H' is the Hamiltonian and is represented by a 2x2 (hermitian) matrix. I have not explicitly written out the matrix in these posts because there is no need. No reply yet, so just thought to clarify that the 'H' referred to is the matrix of the Hamiltonian. What is meant by its 'action' on the two orthonormal states of the two state system?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top