Definition of potential energy

AI Thread Summary
The change in potential energy is defined as PE1 - PE0 = -W to illustrate the relationship between work and energy transfer between systems. When potential energy increases (PE1 > PE0), the work done is negative, indicating that the system has absorbed energy. Conversely, if potential energy decreases (PE1 < PE0), the work done is positive, meaning energy is lost from the system. This convention helps clarify the direction of energy flow, where the "giver" of work loses energy and the "recipient" gains it. The discussion emphasizes that gravitational work is equal in magnitude but opposite in sign to the work done by an external force when lifting an object.
Genericcoder
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
Why is change in potential energy is defined as

PE1 - PE0 = -W

I mean I could see it for example for gravity if we took PE0 to be zero at ground and we integerated -mgy(y^) we get -mg(y0 - y1) -> -mgh,but is their a proof somewhere where it shows it will be always negative work ?
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It won't always be negative work. If the potential energy increases, PE1 > PE0, so W < 0. That says that rather than doing work the system absorbed work. If the potential energy reduces, PE1 < PE0, so W > 0.
 
W, is work, defined as energy lost from the system. If energy is gained, the system has lost negative work. It's just a convention of direction of energy flow between environment and system.
 
Thank you guys that makes perfect sense.
 
Genericcoder said:
Why is change in potential energy is defined as

PE1 - PE0 = -W

We define it this way so that work can be interpreted as a transfer of energy from one object to another: the "giver" of the work decreases its energy, and the "recipient" of the work increases its energy. Consider lifting an object at constant velocity against gravity (so its kinetic energy doesn't change). You do positive work mgΔh (the force you exert is in the same direction as the motion), and your own internal energy decreases in the process. The object's gravitational potential energy increases, therefore its PEfinal - PEinitial = Wdone by you.

The force that you exert on the object as you lift it is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the gravitational force on the object. Therefore the gravitational force does work on the object that is equal in magnitude but with opposite sign to the work that you do. Therefore we can also write

PEfinal - PEinitial = -Wgravity
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top