Definitive measurement that determines state of matter?

AI Thread Summary
Determining a substance's state of matter can be challenging, as definitions like "very little room between molecules" lack empirical clarity. The discussion highlights that while practical tests exist, such as pouring a substance to identify liquids or assessing structural integrity for solids, these methods can be subjective. The distinction between solid and liquid states is often blurred, especially in cases like non-Newtonian fluids or substances at critical points. The conversation emphasizes that states of matter are rough characterizations rather than strict classifications. Overall, the complexity of physical systems complicates the definitive measurement of states of matter.
curiousoldguy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
What is an (the?) empirically demonstrable method used for determining a substance's state of matter?

If a new substance was discovered and scientist A said it's solid and scientist B said it's a liquid, how would it be demonstrably proven to be one or the other? The books I have define states of matter in scientifically unsatisfying terms like "if there is very little room between molecules but they can move it's a liquid": it doesn't seem testable: my definition of "very little room" might be different than yours. For example, is there a magic heat capacity that for any substance, if it's above 25 J/C it's by definition a solid? I can look-up tables of characteristics for known substances, but what about one that falls from outer space we know nothing about?

Thanks for any insight. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A substance's state of matter is just a rough characterization. Real physical systems are not always so clearly distinct to where they can be classified. For example, at the critical point and beyond the liquid and gas phases are not distinct.
 
See/Google "non-Newtonian fluids."
 
Thanks. I got the feeling they were general terms. :)
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top