Deflection and oscillations in a homemade microgram balance.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the construction and optimization of a homemade microgram balance, specifically comparing the use of threaded titanium rods versus threaded steel rods. The user inquires whether a titanium rod will damp oscillations more quickly due to its lower density and higher cost, and seeks clarification on the deflection characteristics of both materials. The conversation also highlights the use of Eddy-Current Damping as an effective method to reduce oscillations in balance beam instruments, explaining the underlying physics of how induced eddy currents oppose motion and enhance stability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of oscillation damping principles
  • Familiarity with material properties, specifically stiffness and density
  • Knowledge of Eddy-Current Damping mechanisms
  • Basic physics concepts related to balance beam instruments
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of titanium and steel for structural applications
  • Learn about the design and implementation of Eddy-Current Damping systems
  • Explore the effects of material density on oscillation energy in balance beams
  • Investigate air damping techniques for precision instruments
USEFUL FOR

Hobbyists building precision scales, physics students studying oscillation and damping, engineers designing balance instruments, and anyone interested in enhancing measurement accuracy in sensitive applications.

SporkInTucson
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

As part of a larger hobby project, I'm building a microgram balance based on the one described at Sci-Toys.com, but I believe my questions are appropriate for the "general physics" forum.

Background: I purchased a 36" threaded steel rod, connected it to a razor, and then put it on a couple glasses for support (I haven't yet started the upturned razors support). I'm amazed at how long it takes the rod's oscillations to damp down to equilibrium. The longer the rod oscillates, the less convenient the scale will be to use, so I've been wondering what I can do about it. The first thing that came to mind was using a threaded titanium rod instead of a threaded steel rod -- they cost 10 times more but they're available online.

Q1: Am I correct in assuming that if two scales both start at the same non-equilibrium initial condition, the one with a titanium rod will damp out to equilibrium before the one with a steel rod, all other aspects of the scales, samples, and reference weights being the same? I think this would be so because the steel version would start with more gravitational potential energy that needs to be damped out.

Q2: Will the endpoints of a titanium rod sag about the same amount as the endpoints of a steel rod, even though the stiffness of steel is about twice that of titanium? I'm guessing this is true because titanium has about half the density of steel, so the decrease in weight per unit length cancels out the decrease in elasticity in the equation for deflection of a cantilevered beam under a uniform load.

Let me know if my intuition and limited physics knowledge are steering me wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Many balance beam instruments use “Eddy-Current Damping” to reduce these oscillations. A conducting plate (aluminum, for example) is attached to the balance arm and placed between the poles of a magnet. As the arm oscillates the plate moves in and out of the magnetic field between the poles of the magnet. This oscillation produces a changing magnetic flux; the magnetic flux induces an emf (electromotive force); this induced emf cause eddy currents to flow on the surface of the plate. The eddy currents generate a magnetic force; the magnetic force acting on the eddy currents must oppose the flux change, according to Lenz's Law, so it must oppose the motion of the balance arm and plate through the magnet; this, in turn, decreases the oscillations of the arm and it comes to rest sooner than without this mechanism.

Here are many images of a wide variety of eddy-current dampers:
eddy current damping - Google Search

Here’s a photo of a magnetic damper for a balance beam in figure 20.24:
http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/EssentialPhysics/chapter20/section20dash5.pdf
 
Any good balance needs to be in an enclosure, to avoid draughts. Air damping can be achieved using wide vanes on either end of the balance beam. The enclosure is even more important here though.
 
Thanks Bobby, Centaur. I wasn't considering a damping mechanism but Eddy Current Damping sounds relatively simple so maybe it would be fun to try.

Any comments on reducing the mass of the beam? If using a material that weighs half as much means that there's half as much energy to damp out on the way to equilibrium, I'll take that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K