Deflection and oscillations in a homemade microgram balance.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design and optimization of a homemade microgram balance, focusing on the effects of material choice on oscillation damping and deflection. Participants explore theoretical aspects of damping mechanisms and structural considerations in the context of balance beam instruments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster (OP) questions whether a titanium rod would damp oscillations more quickly than a steel rod, assuming both start from the same initial conditions, due to differences in gravitational potential energy.
  • The OP also inquires about the sagging behavior of titanium versus steel rods, hypothesizing that the decrease in weight per unit length may offset the differences in stiffness.
  • One participant suggests using Eddy-Current Damping as a method to reduce oscillations, explaining the underlying physics of how it works and providing a link to additional resources.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of enclosing the balance to avoid air currents and suggests using wide vanes for air damping.
  • The OP expresses interest in the idea of Eddy-Current Damping and asks about the implications of reducing the mass of the beam on the energy that needs to be damped out.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views regarding the best materials and methods for damping oscillations in the balance. There is no consensus on the effectiveness of different approaches or materials, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the behavior of materials under load and the effectiveness of various damping techniques, which may depend on specific design choices and conditions not fully explored in the thread.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in DIY physics projects, particularly those focused on precision measurement instruments, as well as those exploring the principles of oscillation damping and material properties in engineering contexts.

SporkInTucson
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

As part of a larger hobby project, I'm building a microgram balance based on the one described at Sci-Toys.com, but I believe my questions are appropriate for the "general physics" forum.

Background: I purchased a 36" threaded steel rod, connected it to a razor, and then put it on a couple glasses for support (I haven't yet started the upturned razors support). I'm amazed at how long it takes the rod's oscillations to damp down to equilibrium. The longer the rod oscillates, the less convenient the scale will be to use, so I've been wondering what I can do about it. The first thing that came to mind was using a threaded titanium rod instead of a threaded steel rod -- they cost 10 times more but they're available online.

Q1: Am I correct in assuming that if two scales both start at the same non-equilibrium initial condition, the one with a titanium rod will damp out to equilibrium before the one with a steel rod, all other aspects of the scales, samples, and reference weights being the same? I think this would be so because the steel version would start with more gravitational potential energy that needs to be damped out.

Q2: Will the endpoints of a titanium rod sag about the same amount as the endpoints of a steel rod, even though the stiffness of steel is about twice that of titanium? I'm guessing this is true because titanium has about half the density of steel, so the decrease in weight per unit length cancels out the decrease in elasticity in the equation for deflection of a cantilevered beam under a uniform load.

Let me know if my intuition and limited physics knowledge are steering me wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Many balance beam instruments use “Eddy-Current Damping” to reduce these oscillations. A conducting plate (aluminum, for example) is attached to the balance arm and placed between the poles of a magnet. As the arm oscillates the plate moves in and out of the magnetic field between the poles of the magnet. This oscillation produces a changing magnetic flux; the magnetic flux induces an emf (electromotive force); this induced emf cause eddy currents to flow on the surface of the plate. The eddy currents generate a magnetic force; the magnetic force acting on the eddy currents must oppose the flux change, according to Lenz's Law, so it must oppose the motion of the balance arm and plate through the magnet; this, in turn, decreases the oscillations of the arm and it comes to rest sooner than without this mechanism.

Here are many images of a wide variety of eddy-current dampers:
eddy current damping - Google Search

Here’s a photo of a magnetic damper for a balance beam in figure 20.24:
http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/EssentialPhysics/chapter20/section20dash5.pdf
 
Any good balance needs to be in an enclosure, to avoid draughts. Air damping can be achieved using wide vanes on either end of the balance beam. The enclosure is even more important here though.
 
Thanks Bobby, Centaur. I wasn't considering a damping mechanism but Eddy Current Damping sounds relatively simple so maybe it would be fun to try.

Any comments on reducing the mass of the beam? If using a material that weighs half as much means that there's half as much energy to damp out on the way to equilibrium, I'll take that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K