Degenerate Perturbation Theory Wavefunction Correction

McLaren Rulez
Messages
289
Reaction score
3
Hi,

If we have a non degenerate solution to a Hamiltonian and we perturb it with a perturbation V, we get the new solution by

|\psi_{n}^{(1)}> = \sum \frac{<\psi_{m}^{(0)}|V|\psi_{n}^{(0)}>}{E_n^{(0)} - E_m^{(0)}}\psi_m^{(0)}

where we sum over all m such that m\neq n.

When we do the same for a degenerate perturbation theory, we simply exclude all the \psi_m that belongs to the degenerate subspace. That is

|\psi_{n}^{(1)}> = \sum \frac{<\psi_{m}^{(0)}|V|\psi_{n}^{(0)}>}{E_n^{(0)} - E_m^{(0)}}\psi_m^{(0)}

only this time the summation exculdes m if \psi_{m} is in the degenerate subspace. Am I right so far?

If so, my question is this. Assuming we are taking the "good" states that Griffiths mentions (those which are the eigenstates of V in the degenerate subspace), then each one has a different energy correction. But the wavefunction correction for all of them is exactly the same according to the expression given above. That seems a little fishy. The first order corrections to each of the "good" states is exactly the same but the first order energy correction is different?

Thank you for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The matrix elements \langle \psi_m^{(0)}|V|\psi_n^{0)}\rangle will be different for different "good states" n from the degenerate subspace, no?
 
Oh dear, I don't know what I was thinking! Sorry about that. It is obviously different for different n. Thank you DrDu.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top