Degenerate Perturbation Theory Wavefunction Correction

McLaren Rulez
Messages
289
Reaction score
3
Hi,

If we have a non degenerate solution to a Hamiltonian and we perturb it with a perturbation V, we get the new solution by

|\psi_{n}^{(1)}> = \sum \frac{<\psi_{m}^{(0)}|V|\psi_{n}^{(0)}>}{E_n^{(0)} - E_m^{(0)}}\psi_m^{(0)}

where we sum over all m such that m\neq n.

When we do the same for a degenerate perturbation theory, we simply exclude all the \psi_m that belongs to the degenerate subspace. That is

|\psi_{n}^{(1)}> = \sum \frac{<\psi_{m}^{(0)}|V|\psi_{n}^{(0)}>}{E_n^{(0)} - E_m^{(0)}}\psi_m^{(0)}

only this time the summation exculdes m if \psi_{m} is in the degenerate subspace. Am I right so far?

If so, my question is this. Assuming we are taking the "good" states that Griffiths mentions (those which are the eigenstates of V in the degenerate subspace), then each one has a different energy correction. But the wavefunction correction for all of them is exactly the same according to the expression given above. That seems a little fishy. The first order corrections to each of the "good" states is exactly the same but the first order energy correction is different?

Thank you for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The matrix elements \langle \psi_m^{(0)}|V|\psi_n^{0)}\rangle will be different for different "good states" n from the degenerate subspace, no?
 
Oh dear, I don't know what I was thinking! Sorry about that. It is obviously different for different n. Thank you DrDu.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top