Degree of Extension: n Primes to Q

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kummer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degree Extension
Kummer
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
Let p_1,p_2,...,p_n be distinct primes.
Show that [\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{p_1},\sqrt{p_2},...,\sqrt{p_n} ) : \mathbb{Q}]= 2^n
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you tried? It's obvious you should use induction, and then the tricky part becomes proving the irreducibility of a certain polynomial in an extension of Q. Have you gotten this far yet?
 
StatusX said:
What have you tried? It's obvious you should use induction, and then the tricky part becomes proving the irreducibility of a certain polynomial in an extension of Q. Have you gotten this far yet?

Yes. I tried induction of course.

Note that, [\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{p_1},...,\sqrt{p_{n+1}}): \mathbb{Q}] = [\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{p_1},...,\sqrt{p_{n+1}})]:\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{p_1},...,\sqrt{p_n})]\cdot [\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{p_1},...,\sqrt{p_n}):\mathbb{Q}] = [\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{p_1},...,\sqrt{p_{n+1}})]:\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{p_1},...,\sqrt{p_n})] \cdot 2^n

So it remains to show,
[\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{p_1},...,\sqrt{p_{n+1}})]:\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{p_1},...,\sqrt{p_n})] = 2

Which can be shown if,
\mbox{deg}(\sqrt{p_{n+1}},\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{p_1},...,\sqrt{p_n}))=2

But the difficult step is the last step. I was reading about this problem and it was solved with "Kummer Theory" but I tried to find my own "elementary" solution.
 
You know \sqrt{p_{n+1}} is a root of x^2-p_{n+1}, so generates an extension of at most degree 2 over any extension of Q. It will generate an extension of degree 2 iff it is not in the original extension. In other words, you need to show there's no element in \mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{p_1},...,\sqrt{p_n}] whose square is p_{n+1}. One way to do this is to note (by induction) that every element in \mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{p_1},...,\sqrt{p_n}] can be written in the form \alpha + \beta \sqrt{p_n} for some \alpha,\beta \in \mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{p_1},...,\sqrt{p_{n-1}}], then square this and find conditions on \alpha and \beta.
 
Last edited:
Yes you are correct, it is really not that bad to proof.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top