Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Delta dirac function times zero

  1. Oct 4, 2011 #1
    Let δ(x)=∞ at x = 0, and zero elsewhere. Then

    δ(x)(1-exp(x)) = ?

    It seems the above expression is zero. But isn't it zero times infinity at x = 0?
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2011
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 4, 2011 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    As you have defined it, δ(x) is not really a function.
    In physics, we usually call it that, but if you want to treat it rigorously you should consider it as a distribution. The most important part about that, is that δ(x) only really makes sense under an integral sign, in expressions like
    [tex]\int \delta(x) f(x) \, dx = f(0)[/tex]
    (if x = 0 is inside the integration interval).
  4. Oct 5, 2011 #3
    OK, then let us consider the following example in a probability book:


    [itex]f(x)=(1-e^{-\lambda x})u(x)[/itex],


    [itex]u(x)= 1, [/itex] if [itex] x \geq 1 [/itex], and zero elsewhere.

    Then, it is found (in the book) that

    [itex] \frac{d}{dx} f(x) = \lambda e^{-\lambda x} u(x)[/itex]

    But I think that the derivative should be:

    [itex] \frac{d}{dx} f(x) = \lambda e^{-\lambda x} u(x) + (1-e^{-\lambda x})\delta (x)[/itex]

    So, should the second term in the above expression be zero? Then how?
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2011
  5. Oct 5, 2011 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    It's easiest to split up the function first.
    For [itex]x \ge 1[/itex], [itex]f(x) = (1 - e^{-\lambda x})[/itex] and the derivative is what you got in the book.
    For [itex]x < 1[/itex], [itex]f(x) = 0[/itex] so [itex]f'(x) = 0[/itex].

    Note that in general f(x) is not differentiable - or even continuous - at x = 1. If you want to use the product rule, you have to consider f(x) as a distribution, which is a whole area of mathematics in itself. (Oh, and you'd probably get [itex]\delta(x - 1)[/itex] rather than just [itex]\delta(x)[/itex]... but that's beside the point).
  6. Oct 5, 2011 #5
    Thank you very much for your answer!

    Let me make a correction in the book example:

    u(x)=1, if x≥0 (not x≥1, as in my previous post), and zero elsewhere.

    In this case f(x) becomes continuous and differentiable. As far as I understand, even in this case I should consider f(x) as a distribution in order to use the product rule. Am I right?
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook