Delta Particles vs Proton/Neutron: What's the Difference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alphali
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta Particles
alphali
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
The quark composition of the Δ0 is the same as that of neutron but much heavier and the quark composition of Δ+ is the same as that of proton but also much heavier, so what is the difference between the delta particles and the proton and neutron and where did that extra mass come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my opinion, the difference lies in the fact that the spins of the quarks combine in such a way that in the case of protons and neutrons the total spin is 1/2, while in the case of the delta particles it is 3/2; this is a physically observable difference.
For what concerns the difference in mass, I'm not sure about what I'm going to say, but I think that it is due to some spin orbit coupling, or some interactions in the "effective nuclear" hamiltonian which involve the spin.
 
There is a spin-spin force that provides a positive energy for quarks with aligned spins, and a negative energy for spins in opposite alignment. All three quarks in the Delta have the same alignment, making it heavier than the proton.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top