Démontrer la Croissance de (Un+1) / Un

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sabine
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on demonstrating that the sequence defined by U1 = 1 and Un+1 = √(1 + Un) satisfies the inequality (Un+1)/Un > 1 for all n. Participants agree that Un is always positive and explore the implications of this sequence's behavior. They note that the sequence converges to a limit of approximately 1.618, which is the only positive solution to the equation Un+1 = Un. The conversation includes attempts to clarify the reasoning behind the inequality and the use of mathematical induction, with some participants expressing confusion over the approach. Ultimately, the sequence is confirmed to be monotonically increasing, reinforcing the validity of the inequality.
Sabine
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
please help me with this

i'll write it in french bcz i don't know the scientific terms in eng

on considere la suite (Un) definie par:
U1= 1
Un+1= racine de (1 + Un) pour tout entier non nul

Demontrer que (Un+1)\Un > 1
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have:
u_{n+1}=\sqrt{1+u_{n}},u_{1}=1
Then, for ALL n, u_{n}>0 (Agreed?)
Thus, we have: \frac{u_{n+1}}{u_{n}}=\sqrt{\frac{1}{u_{n}^{2}}+1}
What does this tell you?
 
i agree on un>0 but how did u get the 2nd result?
 
u_{n+1}=\sqrt{1+u_{n}}

Divide both sides by u_n
 
ok but the second one isn't 1 it's 1\Un
 
That's correct. I'm not sure howArildno got that.
 
AARGH! MY flaw has been discovered before I got to apologize.
Just forget it, Sabine.
Sorry..
 
it's ok anyway thanks for trying to help
 
Where does the inequality x^2 < x+1 [/itex] hold ? (ie : for what values of x)
 
  • #10
0<x<2 but this is not the problem
 
  • #11
when x is = to Un
 
  • #12
soory i didnt get it arildno
 
  • #13
i did not understand i don't want it by reccurency i think this is how u got the result then how did u consider that bn >0
 
  • #14
There were LATEX errors in my first post; they have now been fixed.

I'm terribly soory; I don't know where mmy mind is today; all I've written is just nonsense.
I'll keep out of this.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Should be easy to do by induction.

u1= 1 and u2= \sqrt{2} so u2> u1.

Assume uk+1> uk for some k. Then uk+2= \sqrt{1+ u_{k+1}}&gt; \sqrt{1+u_k}= \u_{k+1}.
 
  • #16
yes i know but it's not how i want it
 
  • #17
hi sabine; je pourrai t'aider.. si tu le veux en francais..
je crois que tu es une etudiante en classe SV?

alors tu as U1= 1
tu calculeras U2 = racine(2)

on suppose que Un est plus grand que 1
alors Un+1 est plus grand que 2
et racine(Un+1) est plus grand que racine(2)

donc on peut diviser (Un+1)/Un et on aura que ce quotient est plus grand que racine(2) d'ou logiquement est plus grand que un


j'espere que tu as compris
 
  • #18
non ce n'est pas par recurrence que je veux je le veux sans le raisonnement par recurence
 
  • #19
Sabine said:
0<x<2 but this is not the problem
In fact, the solution is right here.

For U(n+1) to be less than U(n), we must have U(n) > 1.618..., (or negative, which is not allowed) but clearly, the described sequence converges to this number and can hence never exceed it.
 
  • #20
pour prouver que U(n+1)/Un plus grand que un

On doit prouver que U(n+1) plus grand que Un

on remarque que U1 plus grand que U0..

Ca doit se faire par recurrence :S?
 
  • #21
ouais c par recurence and gokul what's the conclusion?
 
  • #22
Given :
u_{n+1}=\sqrt{1+u_{n}},u_{1}=1

To prove, for all n,
\frac{u_{n+1}}{u_{n}} &gt; 1

What I had in mind before was not rigorous.

Simply ask youself what the given sequence converges to. As always, the limiting value of the sequence is determined by setting u_{n+1} = u_n, which gives \lim _ {n \rightarrow \infty} u_n = 1.618...

The fact that there is only one positive solution in real n (ie.:1.618...) to the above condition tells you that the sequence is monotonic. Looking at values for n=1,2 tells you that it is monotonically increasing.
 
Back
Top