Demostration of gravity as expansion of matter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between space and time, particularly the theory that space doubles in size every 30 seconds, suggesting that time must also double to maintain the speed of light. It explores the behavior of a pendulum, which, despite varying distances, takes the same time for oscillations due to the effects of gravity and centrifugal force. Participants note that the perceived constancy of time in pendulum motion may be an illusion created by these forces. Additionally, there are references to the observable universe's expansion and the rapid doubling of size during the inflationary era after the Big Bang. The conversation concludes with a consensus on the complexities of time dilation related to gravity and motion.
sea_wizard
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
in order to prove this theroy since space doubles its size every 30 seconds more or less you should prove that time also doubles in order to keep the speed of light

i start by considering that to run a distance with the same aceleration of speed and aceleration of braking from 0 to 0 the shorter the distance the shorter the time this is obvious

but a pendulum behaves diferently for a smaller distance with each oscillation (because of friction) takes the same time with the same aceleration (gravity)

it should take less time for each oscillation of the pendulum but it takes the same.

that is because time doubles every 30 seconds as well as space making appear the shorter time of the shorter oscilations to be the same but that is just our perception truly and fisically the shorter the oscillation the shorter the time

of course i can be wrong tell me if you see any mistake here


ps: please send me the 3 other posts by raaid mustafa besides the 5th dimension since they are not avalaible any more
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Observable spacetime has a radius of 1028 cm. It has doubled in size in the last 1028 cm/((21/3) x 3 x 1010 cm/sec)=3 x 1017 sec, definitely not the 30 seconds you state.

During the inflationary era, ~10-35 sec after the big bang, the universe doubled its size roughly every 10-50 sec.
 
too many numbers for me to understand that

but the pendulum behavior still strikes me since it seems that the extra centrifugal force add to the force of gravity seems to dilate time

a same pendulum going from 3 o clock to 9 will take the same time that if it goes from 5 to 7

the only diference between the two cases is that in the second there's a predominancy of the centrigugal force (proportionally there's more centrifugal force in the second case than in the first
since proportionaly there's more horizontal movement)

seems that the increase of gravity due to the more proportion of the centrifugal force that push downwards, just as gravity, dilates time making the pendulum has less aceleration in the second case than in the first when it should be the opposite

there fore you could say the more gravity the more dilatation of time

i just can find other explanation for the extrange behaviour of the pendulum
 
i correct my self the more increase of gravity the more dilatation of time, the more decrease of gravity the more shrink of time
 
Originally posted by Loren Booda
Observable spacetime has a radius of 1028 cm. It has doubled in size in the last 1028 cm/((21/3) x 3 x 1010 cm/sec)=3 x 1017 sec, definitely not the 30 seconds you state.

During the inflationary era, ~10-35 sec after the big bang, the universe doubled its size roughly every 10-50 sec.

note: he ment 30 parasec.
 
Thanks, QuantumNet.

sea_wizard, The pendulum to first approximation has equal periods for different maximum amplitudes. Remember, though, the substitution of linear [the] for nonlinear sin[the] used in simplifying its angular time dependence.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top