Denominator in cosmological constant term in Newtonian gravity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the cosmological constant term in Newtonian gravity as presented in "General Relativity: An Introduction for Physicists." The equation derived is \(\vec{g}=-\nabla\Phi=-\frac{GM}{r^{2}}\hat{\vec{r}}+\frac{\Lambda c^{2}r}{3}\hat{\vec{r}}\), where the factor of 1/3 in the denominator is attributed to integrating \(\Lambda r^2\). Participants emphasize that understanding these numerical factors often requires rigorous mathematical derivation rather than intuitive reasoning.

PREREQUISITES
  • General relativity fundamentals
  • Einstein's field equations (EFE)
  • Newtonian gravity principles
  • Mathematical integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Einstein's field equations in detail
  • Explore the implications of the cosmological constant in cosmology
  • Learn about spherical symmetry in general relativity
  • Review mathematical techniques for integrating functions involving \(\Lambda\)
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of general relativity, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of cosmological models and gravitational theories.

Messenger
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
In General relativity: an introduction for physicists, the authors derive Newtonian gravity from the EFE, but then they also give a short statement that inserting in the cosmological constant derives down to:
[tex] \vec{g}=-\nabla\Phi=-\frac{GM}{r^{2}}\hat{\vec{r}}+\frac{\Lambda c^{2}r}{3}\hat{\vec{r}}.[/tex]

I don't see how they end up with a 3 in the denominator. Probably am missing something simple. Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure, the factor of 1/3 comes from integrating Λr2. :smile:

Seriously, I don't think you can expect an intuitive motivation for each factor of two or three. Intuition is great for order of magnitude estimates, or determining minus signs, but to get right down to an actual numerical factor you usually just need to plow through the math.

One of Einstein's equations for spherical symmetry happens to be d(r g00)/dr = 1 - Λr2, and the solution for g00 has a 1/3 in it.
 
Heh, I wish it was just the integration (and maybe it just is :redface:). Anyway, I should probably post how I think it is done here and maybe someone can pinpoint where my confusion lies (or more likely I will just end up embarrassing myself :-p).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K