Density of cylinder, error propagation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the density of a cylinder using given measurements for mass, diameter, and height, along with their associated uncertainties. The problem involves error propagation in the context of physics, specifically focusing on how to accurately determine the density and its error based on the provided data.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss calculating the volume using the formula for a cylinder and then applying the density formula. There are questions about the appropriate error propagation methods and the implications of large measurement uncertainties, particularly regarding the height of the cylinder.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered insights into the error propagation formulas and the implications of the large uncertainties in the measurements. There is an ongoing exploration of how to apply these formulas correctly, with some participants expressing concerns about the validity of the measurement errors provided.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the height measurement has a significant relative error, which raises questions about its reliability. There is also a mention of using numerical methods as an alternative approach to error propagation.

STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



The density of a cylinder is calculated from the following data:

##m= (2.8±0.8)g##
##d = (2.2±0.1)cm##
##h = (4.0±1.0) cm##

What is the error on the density, before rounding, in ##\frac{g}{cm^3}##?

Homework Equations



##V = \pi r^2 h = \frac{1}{4} \pi d^2 h##

Ans : 0.072

The Attempt at a Solution



Not sure this is the right section for this. I figured I would first calculate the volume, then use ##d = \frac{m}{V}##.

##V = \frac{1}{4} \pi d^2 h##
##V = \frac{1}{4} \pi (2.2±0.1)(2.2±0.1)(4.0±1.0) cm^3##
##V = \frac{1}{4} \pi (19±6) cm^3##

How would I propagate the scalars in front?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The constants (pi and 4) have no error. What error propagation formula do you use?

ehild
 
So we have (before rounding):

##V = \frac{1}{4} \pi (19.36 \pm 6.58)##
##V = (15.21 \pm 5.17)##

?

I don't really have a formula to use for this. I remember something about ##\sqrt{ ( \frac{∂f}{∂x})^2 \sigma_x^2 + ( \frac{∂f}{∂y})^2 \sigma_y^2 + ... }##, but I don't think that will help.
 
Is the height of the cylinder truly not known to within 25% of its actual value (4.0+/-1.0) cm? This measurement error seems to be rather a lot.
 
Zondrina said:
So we have (before rounding):

##V = \frac{1}{4} \pi (19.36 \pm 6.58)##
##V = (15.21 \pm 5.17)##

?

I don't really have a formula to use for this. I remember something about ##\sqrt{ ( \frac{∂f}{∂x})^2 \sigma_x^2 + ( \frac{∂f}{∂y})^2 \sigma_y^2 + ... }##, but I don't think that will help.

Yes, that it is. f is the density, and its error is ##\sqrt{ ( \frac{∂f}{∂x})^2 \sigma_x^2 + ( \frac{∂f}{∂y})^2 \sigma_y^2 + ... }## Now you have three variables, m, d, h. Replace σ-s by the given errors.

ehild
 
I agree with SteamKing - the errors seem very large. In fact, they seem so large that I think it is not appropriate to approximate using derivatives only and symmetric errors on the parameters are going to result in asymmetric errors in the final quantity. However, this is probably not what was intended in the question ...
 
Sorry for the late reply. The errors are as such, as crazy as that is.

With ##\rho = \frac{4}{\pi} \frac{m}{d^2 h}## being the density. The error on ##\rho## is given by:

##\sigma_{\rho} = \sqrt{ ( \frac{∂ \rho}{∂m})^2 \sigma_m^2 + ( \frac{∂ \rho}{∂d})^2 \sigma_d^2 + ( \frac{∂ \rho}{∂ h})^2 \sigma_h^2 }##

##\frac{∂ \rho}{∂m} = \frac{4}{\pi} \frac{1}{d^2 h}##

##\frac{∂ \rho}{∂d} = - \frac{8}{\pi} \frac{m}{(d^3 h)}##

##\frac{∂ \rho}{∂h} = - \frac{4}{\pi} \frac{m}{(dh)^2}##

The errors are obvious to plug in. What should I do about the variables though i.e ##d, h## and ##m##?

EDIT: As a side note, I got the answer awhile ago, but I did it using numerical methods rather than the partial derivatives.

I'd like to learn how to use this formula as I see the value in learning it.
 
Zondrina said:
The errors are obvious to plug in. What should I do about the variables though i.e ##d, h## and ##m##?

Substitute the given mean values. m=2.8, d=2.2, h=4.0.

You can notice that
##\frac{∂ \rho}{∂m} = \frac{\rho}{m}##
##\frac{∂ \rho}{∂d} = - 2\frac{\rho}{d} ##
##\frac{∂ \rho}{∂h} = - \frac{\rho}{h} ##

The error you get is the probable error, less than the maximum error, half the difference between the possible maximum and minimum densities. And the other posters are right, the error of h is too big.

ehild
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD and STEMucator
ehild said:
Substitute the given mean values. m=2.8, d=2.2, h=4.0.

You can notice that
##\frac{∂ \rho}{∂m} = \frac{\rho}{m}##
##\frac{∂ \rho}{∂d} = - 2\frac{\rho}{d} ##
##\frac{∂ \rho}{∂h} = - \frac{\rho}{h} ##

The error you get is the probable error, less than the maximum error, half the difference between the possible maximum and minimum densities. And the other posters are right, the error of h is too big.

ehild

Indeed the error on ##h## is ridiculous. The answer complements of wolfram for anyone who is interested:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sqrt%28+%28%284%2Fpi%29%281%2F%284%282.2%29^2%29%29%29^2++%280.8%29^2+%2B+%28+%288%2Fpi%29+2.8%2F%284*2.2^3%29%29^2+%280.1%29^2+%2B+%28+%284%2Fpi%29%282.8%29%2F%282.2*4.0%29^2+%29^2+%281.0%29^2++%29

Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
798
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K