Depletion zone and current in forward-biased PN junction

goodphy
Messages
212
Reaction score
8
Hello.

I've learned that in PN junction, forward-biasing pushes holes in P-type and electrons in N-type forward junctions so depletion width is reduced. Is it due to that in N-type (P-type), pushed electrons (holes) are recombined with holes (electrons) in depletion zone?

And what is true identity of current in forward-bias? In this biasing, I guess there are two kinds of current; charge carrier diffusion due to carrier concentration imbalance at the junction (diffusion current) and drifted carrier pushed by external field in biasing (drift current). Is forward-biasing current consisted of both types of current or one of them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do not post the same question twice!
 
PietKuip said:
Do not post the same question twice!

I'm sorry but I didn't know how to remove my uploaded post. So I had no choice but upload the question to other more relevant forum.

Could you tell me how to delete post?
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top