Derivation for Time to Max Radioactivity Transient Equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the time to maximum activity (tm) for transient equilibrium between a parent and daughter radioactive substance. The desired formula is tm = (1 / (λ1-λ2)) * ln(λ1/λ2), with an alternative expression involving half-life also mentioned. The example of a Mo-99 and Tc-99m generator illustrates the concept, where Tc-99m's activity increases to a peak before declining. Participants suggest using Bateman equations to derive the expression for Tmax, which is approximately 24 hours. The conversation emphasizes the need for a clear derivation process for these equations.
matthewt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm having a bit of difficulty deriving the time to max activity for the case of transient equilibrium for a parent-daughter.

This is where I want to get to , tm = (1 / (λ1-λ2)) * 1n(λ1/λ2)

I believe there is an alternative equation for tm as well expressed in terms of half-life.

I would be gratefeul if someone could walk me through a derivation,

BW,
Matt
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean that you have some parent substance, with a given half-life time, which produces some daughter substance, with another given half-life time (which then decays into an inactive substance), and you need to find out the time it gets for the mix to attain maximum activity?
 
that's right. For the case of a Mo-99 and Tc-99m generator, at t=0, let the activity of Tc-99m be zero. The activity of Tc99m will increase until it reaches a maximum value, but will then start to decline as per transient equilibrium. I think using the bateman equations you can derive an expression for Tmax, the time it takes for the Tc-99m to reach it's max activity (which is ~ 24 hours). A derivation of that equation is what I'm after.

thanks,
matt
 
Do you understand how the single-step decay equation is obtained and solved?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top