I Derivation of a Higher Order Derivative Test

bagasme
Messages
79
Reaction score
9
TL;DR Summary
How can we generalize first and second-order derivative tests to higher derivatives?
Hello,

In second-order derivative test, the test is inconclusive when ##f''(c)=0##, so we had to generalize to higher-order derivative test.

I was wondering how such tests can be generalized and derived?

For example, how can I prove that ##f(x)=x^4## have minimum at 0?

Bagas
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bagasme said:
Summary:: How can we generalize first and second-order derivative tests to higher derivatives?

Hello,

In second-order derivative test, the test is inconclusive when ##f''(c)=0##, so we had to generalize to higher-order derivative test.

I was wondering how such tests can be generalized and derived?

For example, how can I prove that ##f(x)=x^4## have minimum at 0?
For this example, there's no need for a test involving higher derivatives. It's easy to see that this function has its minimum at 0 because, if x > 0, then f'(x) > 0, and if x < 0, then f'(x) < 0. In other words, f is decreasing on ##(-\infty, 0)## and is increasing on ##(0, \infty)##. It's as simple as that.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara and FactChecker
Mark44 said:
For this example, there's no need for a test involving higher derivatives. It's easy to see that this function has its minimum at 0 because, if x > 0, then f'(x) > 0, and if x < 0, then f'(x) < 0. In other words, f is decreasing on ##(-\infty, 0)## and is increasing on ##(0, \infty)##. It's as simple as that.
Nope, I just want higher derivative test derivation.
 
Assume that the function is analytic. If the first non-zero derivative at the point ##x_0## is the n'th derivative, then the function behaves locally like ##f(x_0)+(f^{(n)}(x_0)/n!) (x-x_0)^n##. So ##x_0## is a local minimum if ##n## is even and ##f^{(n)}(x_0) \gt 0##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes bagasme and pbuk
I saw the derivation on SE forum, is the explanation right?
 
bagasme said:
I saw the derivation on SE forum, is the explanation right?
Yes. In fact, it points out a correction that I must make by adding ##f(x_0)## to my post. I will edit and fix my post.
 
Back
Top