Derivation of creation and annihilation operator commutation relations

carranty
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm hopng someone can help me. I've begun working my way through Lahiri's "A first book of quantum field theory". In chapter 3 he shows the Fourier decomposition of the free field is given by

<br /> \phi(x) = \int \frac{d^3 P}{\sqrt{(2\pi)^3 2E_p}} (a(p) e^{-ip\cdot x} + a^D(p) e^{ip \cdot x})<br />

and its canonical momenta
<br /> <br /> \Pi (x) = \int d^3 p i \sqrt{\frac{E_p}{2(2\pi)^3}} (-a(p) e^{-i p \cdot x} + a^D (p) e^{ip \cdot x})<br />

where a^D is the transpose conjugate (I couldn't find a dagger symbol). I'm struggling with Ex3.4, deriving the commutation relations between the creation and annihilation operators. He hints that we should inverse FT the above to get equations for a(p) and a^D(p) explicitly, and then use the commutation relation

<br /> [\phi(\vec{x},t), \Pi(\vec{y},t)] = i \delta^3 (\vec{x} - \vec{y}).<br />


However I'm not sure I'm even correct with the first step, I've never inverse FT'd an expression with two exponentials in it, I'm not sure I'm doing it right. Can anyone suggest how I could proceed further with the below line?

<br /> \tilde{F}[\phi(x)] = \tilde{F}[\int \frac{d^3 P}{\sqrt{(2\pi)^3 2E_p}} a(p) e^{-ip\cdot x}] + \tilde{F}[ \int \frac{d^3 P}{\sqrt{(2\pi)^3 2E_p}} a^D(p) e^{ip \cdot x}]<br />

Once I've found a(p) and a^D(p), I suspect the rest will be straightforward.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks!</code>To inverse FT, you need to apply the following formula:\tilde{F}[f(x)] = \int d^3 x f(x) e^{-i p \cdot x}So, you have:\tilde{F}[\phi(x)] = \int d^3 x \left(\int \frac{d^3 p}{\sqrt{(2\pi)^3 2E_p}} a(p) e^{-ip\cdot x} + \int \frac{d^3 p}{\sqrt{(2\pi)^3 2E_p}} a^D(p) e^{ip \cdot x}\right) e^{-i p \cdot x}Now, you can use the linearity of the integral to pull out the integral over p:\tilde{F}[\phi(x)] = \int \frac{d^3 p}{\sqrt{(2\pi)^3 2E_p}} a(p) \int d^3 x e^{-i (p+p') \cdot x} + \int \frac{d^3 p}{\sqrt{(2\pi)^3 2E_p}} a^D(p) \int d^3 x e^{i (p+p') \cdot x}The integrals in the above equation are delta functions, so you can solve for a(p) and a^D(p):a(p) = \tilde{F}[\phi(x)] \sqrt{\frac{(2\pi)^3 2E_p}{2}} \delta^3 (p+p')a^D(p) = \tilde{F}[\phi(x)] \sqrt{\frac{(2\pi)^3 2E_p}{2}} \delta^3 (p-p')Now, you can use the commutation relation [\phi(\vec{x},t), \Pi(\vec{y},t)] = i \delta^3 (\vec{x} - \vec{y})to derive the commutation relations between the creation and
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top