Derivation of Hydrodynamic Equations from Interacting Particles

  • Thread starter Thread starter dario.bettoni
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydrodynamic Limit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a detailed derivation of hydrodynamic equations, specifically the Navier-Stokes equations, from the perspective of interacting particles. The original poster, Dario, seeks a comprehensive explanation that accounts for scenarios where the free streaming length is comparable to the averaging box size, which is not typically covered in standard textbooks. A participant suggests several resources, including "Principles of Condensed Matter Physics" by Chaikin and Lubensky, "Molecular Hydrodynamics" by Boon and Yip, and "Macrotransport Processes" by Brenner and Edwards, although they express uncertainty about fully grasping the material. The conversation highlights the need for more specialized literature to address this complex topic. Understanding these derivations is essential for advanced studies in fluid dynamics.
dario.bettoni
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi there, does any of you know a place where I can find the derivation of the hydrodynamic equations (navier stokes, etc) starting from interacting particles? I need this done in a pedantic way as I have to deal with the case in which the free streaming length is of the same order of the averaging box, which is not the case in standard textbooks.

Thanks,

Dario
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with the terminology "free streaming length" but the Navier-Stokes equations assume a continuous medium, so they aren't derived from individual particle collisions.
 
dario.bettoni said:
Hi there, does any of you know a place where I can find the derivation of the hydrodynamic equations (navier stokes, etc) starting from interacting particles? I need this done in a pedantic way as I have to deal with the case in which the free streaming length is of the same order of the averaging box, which is not the case in standard textbooks.

Thanks,

Dario

Chaikin and Lubensky's book "Principles of Condensed Matter Physics" has a derivation, as does Boon and Yip, "Molecular Hydrodynamics" and to some degree Brenner and Edwards "Macrotransport Processes". I wouldn't claim to fully understand the material, tho.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top