I have been reading DF Lawden's nice book on tensor calculus and relativity. I keep going back to first chapter (p 9-11) as I did not 100% get his derivation of the "special" Lorentz transformation. He writes about a rotational transformation in one plane and then writes about a translational transformation, and then out pops the Lorentz transforms. The math in each step is easy but I am missing the logic of his argument and have never seen the Lorentz transformation derived in this fashion. How does the rotation lead to equations of translation? What exactly is he doing here?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Thanks, Howard

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Derivation Of Lorentz Transformation by Lawden

Loading...

Similar Threads - Derivation Lorentz Transformation | Date |
---|---|

I Question about derivation of lorentz transformation | Feb 24, 2017 |

Unnecessary step in deriving the Lorentz transformations? | Jan 30, 2016 |

Deriving Lorentz transformations | Dec 17, 2015 |

Lorentz Transformations with Special Relativity Derivation | Aug 6, 2015 |

Derivation of Lorentz transformation (time) | Aug 24, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**