Derivation of sagging expression

AI Thread Summary
The sagging expression for a centrally loaded bar is derived as δ = W l^3/(4bd^3Y), where Y is the Young's modulus. The discussion emphasizes the use of calculus for this derivation, referencing the Euler–Bernoulli beam theory, particularly the section on three-point bending. It notes that shear force remains constant at half the central load and changes sign at the midpoint. The bending moment is described as varying linearly, reaching its maximum at the center of the beam. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately deriving the sagging expression.
Alpharup
Messages
226
Reaction score
17
A bar of length l, breadth b, and depth d when loaded at the centre by a load W sags by
an amount given by
δ = W l^3/(4bd^3Y). Here Y is the young's modulus of the wire. My textbook says that we have to use little calculus to derive this expression. Can you please derive this?
 
  • Like
Likes mohamed hassan
Physics news on Phys.org
It gets pretty complicated. But take a look at the Wikipedia article "Euler–Bernoulli beam theory", especially the section "Three-point bending" and see if that is any help.

"The shear is constant in absolute value: it is half the central load, P/2. It changes sign in the middle of the beam. The bending moment varies linearly from one end, where it is 0, and the center where its absolute value is PL/4. The deformation of the beam is described by a polynomial of third degree over a half beam (the other half being symmetrical)."
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top