I Derivation of the photon energy

shaiyefet
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

Anybody knows if the photon energy (frequency * Planck's constant) can be derived from more basic physical principles or this formula was "invented" to explain the photo-electric effect or black body radiation?

If you know a way to derive it, please share.

Thanks a lot !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Everything is fundamentally based on observations. Our theories are made based on those observations, and have to agree with them.
Special relativity would not work if energy would not be proportional to frequency. From the observation that physics, and in particular the speed of light, is the same for all observers, and quantization from quantum mechanics, you can derive E/f = constant. This constant is then called Planck constant.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Thanks for your comment,
Do you know any specific textbook that shows how to derive E/f=const. ?
Thanks
 
You can't really derive it, it was (and is) an experimental observation.
 
Well, you can derive it based on other assumptions (in particular, those of special relativity). Lorentz transformations require that both E and f scale in the same way. Otherwise you would not get the same invariant mass of systems of two photons or photon plus massive particle.

Special relativity is not based on quantized light, although both were introduced in the same year by the same person. Lorentz transformations are actually a bit older.
 
  • Like
Likes entropy1
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top