Derivative Constant: No Intervals of Concavity

orangesang
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
ok. So if the second derivative of a function is equal to a constant and i want to find any intervals of concavity there is none right? therefore no infelction points nor relative and/or absolute extrma

f(second derivative)(x)=2
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A function is called concave if the second derivative is negative. So if f'' is constant, then it is everywhere either concave, or convex (or f'' = 0). Inflection points are those where the derivative changes sign, so indeed there are none. The extrema have to do with the first derivatives of the function. For example, I can make up a function f(x) such that f''(x) = 2 but which has a global minimum... can you?
 
For example, f(x)= x2 has second derivative 2 and is convex for all x and has 0 as an absolute minimum.

f(x)= -x2 has second derivative -2 and is concave for all x and has 0 as an absolute maximum.

Of course, neither of those has any inflection points.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top