Derivative of 2^x: How to Calculate

  • Thread starter Thread starter l33t_V
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
AI Thread Summary
The derivative of 2^x can be calculated by rewriting it as e^(x ln(2)). This transformation allows the use of the derivative rule for exponential functions, specifically d/dx(e^(f(x))) = f'(x)e^(f(x)). The standard power rule, d/dx(x^n) = n x^(n-1), cannot be applied directly because the base must be the variable being differentiated. This discussion highlights the importance of understanding the rules of calculus for functions that do not fit standard forms. Overall, the derivative of 2^x is ln(2) * 2^x.
l33t_V
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello all. I would like to know what is the derivative of 2^x and how it is done. Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Here's a hint, start by expressing it as :

2^x = e^{x \ln(2)}
 
I'll give it a try. But why can't it be solved as we do x^k ? Like k*x'*x^(k-1)
 
l33t_V said:
I'll give it a try. But why can't it be solved as we do x^k ? Like k*x'*x^(k-1)

Because that's against the rules.

The rule is

\frac{d}{dx}(x^n) = n x^{n-1}

The base has to be the variable being differentiated against. The exponent has to be constant with respect to the base.

Luckily, all is not lost. We have lots of rules in calculus. Instead, we can use this one.

\frac{d}{dx}(e^{f(x)}) = f'(x) e^{f(x)}

This rule can only be used when the base is the Euler number e and when the exponent is a function of x. If we want to use this rule for your problem, we can do a little advanced algebra to change the base (which is what uart suggested).

Some problems in calculus can't be solved exactly, even if they look super simple. For example, if you have the function f(x) = x^x, you can use NEITHER rule.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top