Derivative of a Quotient with Chain Rule: Finding dy/dx at a Specific Point

  • Thread starter Thread starter linuxux
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the derivative of a function defined as a quotient, specifically y = (1 - 2u) / (1 + u), where u = √(x² - 7). The goal is to compute dy/dx at the point x = 4, utilizing the chain rule and quotient rule for differentiation.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of the chain rule and quotient rule, with some discussing the potential for simplification. There are attempts to express dy/dx in terms of u and x, while others question the necessity of substituting u back into the equation.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some confirming the correctness of derivatives and others expressing confusion about the application of the chain rule. There is a recognition of the need to express everything in terms of x for clarity, and some participants are reconsidering their approaches based on feedback.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on using the chain rule effectively without substituting one function into another, as well as a focus on ensuring all expressions are in terms of the variable x for the derivative calculation.

linuxux
Messages
133
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If [tex]y=\frac{1-2u}{1+u}[/tex] and [tex]u=\sqrt{x^2-7}[/tex], find [tex]\frac{dy}{dx}[/tex] at [tex]x=4[/tex]

Homework Equations



quotient and chain rule

The Attempt at a Solution



so if [tex]f=y[/tex] then [tex]y^{'}=f^{'}[/tex] then [tex]f^{'} = \left( \frac{f}{g}\right)^{'} = \frac{f^{'}g - fg^{'}}{g^2}[/tex]

and if [tex]f=1-2u[/tex] then [tex]f^{'} = -\left( x^2 -7\right)^\frac{-1}{2} 2x[/tex]

and if [tex]g=1+u[/tex] then [tex]g^{'} = x\left( x^2 -7\right)^\frac{-1}{2}[/tex]

and [tex]g^2 = x^2 + 2\sqrt{x^2 -7}-6[/tex]

and now with chain rule:

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{dy}{du}\frac{du}{dx}=\left(\frac{-2\left(1+u\right)-\left(1-2u\right)}{\left(1+u\right)^{2}}\right)\left(x\left(x^{2}-7\right)^{\frac{-1}{2}}\right)[/tex]

i think?
u in terms of x like this:

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{dy}{du}\frac{du}{dx}=\left(\frac{-2\left(1+\sqrt{x^2-7}\right)-\left(1-2\sqrt{x^2-7}\right)}{\left(1+\sqrt{x^2-7}\right)^{2}}\right)\left(x\left(x^{2}-7\right)^{\frac{-1}{2}}\right)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try the chain rule:

dy/dx =dy/du(du/dx)

should be easy as that
 
your f ', g ' and g^2 look correct
 
You could also simply substitute u(x) back into the equation, though I would personally go with chain rule.
 
okay, hopefully i can simplify it somehow...
 
linuxux said:
okay, hopefully i can simplify it somehow...

Did you understand what was said? You appear to be completely ignoring it. YOU put the "chain rule" as one of the relevant equations. The chain rule is specifically to do problems like this without having to substitute one function into another. Use the chain rule, not that complicated formula for y(x) you have!
 
HallsofIvy said:
Did you understand what was said? You appear to be completely ignoring it. YOU put the "chain rule" as one of the relevant equations. The chain rule is specifically to do problems like this without having to substitute one function into another. Use the chain rule, not that complicated formula for y(x) you have!

Okay, i will try it again with the chain rule, i don't understand how the chain rule can be used since i can't see a function that's "in" another function? where is it? i actually made a mistake when i wrote chain rule, but since you say its easier i want to do it that way, i will search for a suitable example.

later that day...

ah, now i see, you don't substitute for u as i did, i also see the solution will be much cleaner, thanks!
 
Last edited:
All the mathematicians will probably hate this, but just think of d/dx as something that you want to "cancel" out. So the chain rule says that if you have h(g(f(x))), which you can repeat indefinitely, that you can take the derivative of dh/dx by incrementally "canceling" the derivatives, like so dh/dx = dh/dg*dg/df*df/dx.

So as an example, the say you have [tex]y = sin((x+1)^2)[/tex], which has a form y = h(g(f(x))), where h is the trig function sin(stuff), g is the function inside of the trig function raised to some power (stuff)^2, and f is the function x+1. The solution would be
[tex]\frac{d(sinfunction)}{dg} * \frac{d(powerfunction)}{df} * \frac{d(finalfunction)}{dx}[/tex]
which evaluates to cos((x+1)^2)*2(x^50+1)*50x^49.

You have a function in terms of u, which is also a function of x. So with the chain rule the equation
[tex]y(u) = \frac{1-2u}{1+u}[/tex] where [tex]u(x) = \sqrt{x^2-7}[/tex]

has the form of [tex]y(h) = \frac{1-2h(g(f(x)))}{1+h(g(f(x)))}[/tex]
*remember there is a square root function in u's expression for x, which is a function in itself.

so dy/dx = dy(h)/dg(f)*dg(f)/df(x)*df(x)/dx.

Make sense?
 
Last edited:
Mindscrape said:
All the mathematicians will probably hate this, but just think of d/dx as something that you want to "cancel" out. So the chain rule says that if you have h(g(f(x))), which you can repeat indefinitely, that you can take the derivative of dh/dx by incrementally "canceling" the derivatives, like so dh/dx = dh/dg*dg/df*df/dx.

So as an example, the say you have [tex]y = sin((x+1)^2)[/tex], which has a form y = h(g(f(x))), where h is the trig function sin(stuff), g is the function inside of the trig function raised to some power (stuff)^2, and f is the function x+1. The solution would be
[tex]\frac{d(sin_function)}{dg} * \frac{d(power_function)}{df} * \frac{d(final_function}{dx}[/tex]
which evaluates to cos((x+1)^2)*2(x^50+1)*50x^49.

You have a function in terms of u, which is also a function of x. So with the chain rule the equation
[tex]y(u) = \frac{1-2u}{1+u}[/tex] where [tex]u(x) = \sqrt{x^2-7}[/tex]

has the form of [tex]y(g) = \frac{1-2g(f(x))}{1+g(f(x))}[/tex]

so dy/dx = dy(g)/df(x)*df(x)/dx.

Make sense?

makes perfect sense.
 
  • #10
Catch my edit though, I forgot there was a square root function in the function for u(x).
 
  • #11
yeah i see the change there too.
 
  • #12
Yes, you seem to have caught the sqrt, so your new answer is right. I would put u in terms of x now though.
 
  • #13
is that what you mean when you say u in terms of x?
 
  • #14
Yeah, it's nice to have everything in terms of the variable you a taking the derivative with respect to. :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K