Derivative of a Real-Valued Function of Several Variables: Junghenn Defn 9.1.3

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Definition 9.1.3 from Hugo D. Junghenn's "A Course in Real Analysis," specifically regarding the derivative of a real-valued function of several variables. Participants clarify that the definition states the existence of a vector $$f'(\mathbf{a})$$ in $$\mathbb{R}^n$$ without requiring proof of its existence. The consensus is that the definition serves as a formal statement rather than a claim that such a vector always exists, emphasizing that proofs are not applicable in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real-valued functions of several variables
  • Familiarity with the concept of derivatives in multivariable calculus
  • Knowledge of vector spaces, specifically $$\mathbb{R}^n$$
  • Basic comprehension of mathematical definitions and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the implications of Definition 9.1.3 in the context of multivariable calculus
  • Study the conditions under which derivatives exist for functions in $$\mathbb{R}^n$$
  • Explore examples of functions that do not have derivatives in multiple dimensions
  • Investigate the role of definitions in mathematical analysis and their limitations
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying real analysis and multivariable calculus, as well as educators seeking to clarify the concept of derivatives in higher dimensions.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Hugo D. Junghenn's book: "A Course in Real Analysis" ...

I am currently focused on Chapter 9: "Differentiation on $\mathbb{R}^n$"

I need some help with an aspect of Definition 9.1.3 ...

Definition 9.1.3 and the relevant accompanying text read as follows:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/7865
View attachment 7866

At the top of the above text, in Definition 9.1.3 we read the following text:

" ... ... there exists a vector $$f'(a)$$ in $$\mathbb{R}^n$$ ... ... "My question is as follows:

How (arguing from the definition of derivative) do we indicate\demonstrate\prove that $$f'(a) \in \mathbb{R}^n$$ ... ...?Hope someone can help ... ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't have to prove it. This is a definition (no proofs allowed). The definition is saying that if there's a vector $f'(\mathbf{a})$ satisfying the definition, then we call it the derivative. The definition is not actually claiming that the vector exists (it doesn't always, depending on $f$).
 
Ackbach said:
You don't have to prove it. This is a definition (no proofs allowed). The definition is saying that if there's a vector $f'(\mathbf{a})$ satisfying the definition, then we call it the derivative. The definition is not actually claiming that the vector exists (it doesn't always, depending on $f$).
Thanks Ackbach ...

Appreciate the help...

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K