Derivative of Gamma Function: Finding the Mistake?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lojzek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the incorrect calculation of the derivative of the Gamma function, where the user mistakenly derived with respect to the wrong variable. The correct approach involves using logarithmic differentiation, which reveals that the derivative should be calculated as (d/dz)t^(z-1) = t^(z-1) ln t. The user acknowledges the error and expresses difficulty in calculating the resulting integral for integer parameter values. This highlights the complexities involved in differentiating the Gamma function accurately. The thread emphasizes the importance of proper variable differentiation in mathematical calculations.
Lojzek
Messages
246
Reaction score
1
I have tried to calculate the derivative of Gamma function and got a strange result, which
is obviously wrong. Can someone find the mistake?

Definition:
Gamma[z]=Integral[t^(z-1)exp(-t)dt]

Derivative:
(d/dz)Gamma[z]=Integral[(d/dz)t^(z-1)exp(-t)dt]=Integral[(z-1)t^(z-2)exp(-t)dt]=
(z-1)*Gamma[z-1]=Gamma[z]

Looks like gamma solves the equation f'=f, but this can't be true, since only
exponential function solves this equation.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your problem is with (d/dz)t^(z-1). What you computed is really (d/dt)t^(z-1). You need to use logarithmic differentiation: (d/dz)t^(z-1) = t^(z-1) ln t
 
You are right, I derived with respect to the wrong variable. I wanted to calculate the derivative of gamma at least at integer parameter values, but it seems I won't be able to do this, since I can't calculate the resulting integral.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top