Understanding the Derivative of ln^2: Integration by Parts

  • Thread starter Thread starter a1ccook
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative Ln
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the integration of the function ln²(x²¹) using integration by parts, specifically addressing the calculation of du. The correct derivative is established as du/dx = 42(ln x²¹)x²⁰. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly applying the integration by parts formula, ∫ f'(x)g(x)dx = f(x)g(x) - ∫ f(x)g'(x)dx, and suggest that while substitution may aid understanding, it is not strictly necessary for solving the integral. The conversation highlights common pitfalls in differentiation and the need for clarity in each step of the integration process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration by parts
  • Knowledge of derivatives and differentiation techniques
  • Familiarity with logarithmic functions
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the integration by parts formula in detail
  • Practice differentiation of logarithmic functions
  • Explore advanced integration techniques beyond substitution
  • Study examples of multiple applications of integration by parts
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on integration techniques, educators teaching integration methods, and anyone seeking to improve their understanding of logarithmic differentiation.

a1ccook
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to understand how they got du in this problem. It is an integration by parts question. Anyway, the question asks me to evaluation this integral by using integration by parts two times
Screen shot 2010-04-18 at 1.56.22 PM.png




Homework Equations


Screen shot 2010-04-18 at 2.06.04 PM.png

This is how we would solve the problem...



The Attempt at a Solution


This is the first step.
Screen shot 2010-04-18 at 1.55.51 PM.png


The solution to the entire problem isn't what I need. I'll be able to get that after I figure out how they got du. I just need to see how you get du.

What it looks like they did was just go 2*(ln x^21)*(1/x)*(21x^2)
This isn't equal to the answer, though. Any ideas? No need to rush on this. The assignment is done, I just got monumentally frustrated with this one.

Thanks in advance to anyone that can help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you suppose to get

\frac{du}{dx} = 42(ln x21)x20
 
Is the substitution really necessary, I mean, is it part of what you're being taught right now and must use it?

Because I find the following way to be more straightforward. Use integration by parts two times via this formula: \int f'(x)g(x)dx = f(x)g(x) - \int f(x)g'(x)dx

by doing the following: \int ln^2(x^{21})dx=\int (x)'ln^2(x^{21})dx=xln^2(x^{21}) - \int x(ln^2(x^{21}))'dx...
 
but that what we learn at school, the substitution is merely to make student more understand i guess. But ones you get it, you don't need those substitution.
 
annoymage said:
you suppose to get

\frac{du}{dx} = 42(ln x21)x20
Wrong. Look at the attachment to the original post. The correct answer is right there.So, to help with the original post.
a1ccook said:
[Anyway, the question asks me to evaluation this integral by using integration by parts two times
Did you do that?

This is the first step.
They gave you part of the first step. In particular, the attachment tells you exactly what to use how to express that integral in the form of \int u dv needed for application of the integration by parts. Then it tells you what du and v are given that assignment. It does not perform the actual integration by parts, that is up to you. Then, as suggested, you should integrate by parts again, obviously with a different choice for u and dv this second step.
 
owho, sorry, i missed to differentiate something, hoho, sorry sorry
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K