Derivative of the inverse of a function

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding the derivative of the inverse function for y = x + (1/x) at y = 17/4. The initial attempt at finding the inverse function is critiqued, highlighting that the proposed inverse does not yield the original input when tested. It is emphasized that the function does not have a unique inverse, and the correct approach involves solving for x in terms of y. The final result indicates that the new y value is approximately 0.42. The conversation concludes with a reminder that the inverse function must satisfy the original equation to be valid.
yurkler
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


y=x+(1/x) at y=17/4

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


y^-1: x=y+(1/y)

differentiate: 1=y'+ln(y)y'
1=y'(1+ln(y))
y'=1/(1+ln(y))

put that over 1: 1+ln(y)

plug in y: 1+ln(17/4)
=approximately 2.447
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
yurkler said:
the function is y=x+(1/x) at y=17/4

attempt:
y^-1: x=y+(1/y)
Here, by switching letters, you have x = f(y). f is the same function as above, except that its argument is now called y.
yurkler said:
differentiate: 1=y'+ln(y)y'
You differentiated with respect to x, so what you have above is 1 = f'(y)*dy/dx
yurkler said:
1=y'(1+ln(y))
y'=1/(1+ln(y))
Now you have dy/dx = 1/f'(y)
yurkler said:
put that over 1: 1+ln(y)
What you're saying and what you're doing are two different things. If you put anything over 1, you get exactly the same thing.

What you did is take the reciprocal. Why?
yurkler said:
plug in y: 1+ln(17/4)
=approximately 2.447

You switched letters, so what was the old y value (17/4) is now an x value. The question is, what is the new y value?

The answer I get is ~.42
 
The inverse function is NOT given by x = y + 1/y

To see this, just use a test value. e.g., if x = 2, then y(2) will give you some value. If you then plug this value into your "inverse" function (i.e. x(y(2)), you should get back 2. But you don't, because:

y(2) = 2 + 1/2 = 5/2

x(5/2) = 5/2 + 2/5 = 25/10 + 4/10 = 29/10

29/10 is not equal to 2. Since you didn't get back what you started with, your "inverse" function x(y) must be wrong.

To get the actual inverse function, solve the equation to find x in terms of y. In other words, solve the equation for x. Hint: you'll find that the function does not have a unique inverse.
 
Mark44 said:
The answer I get is ~.42

42!
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K