Derivative of ##\theta## w.r.t. ##a##: A Detailed Explanation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on differentiating the angle theta with respect to the variable a, where a is the only changing dimension while r and l are constants. The formula for theta is given as an arccosine function involving a rational expression. The derivative is derived using the chain rule and the quotient rule, resulting in a complex expression that includes both trigonometric identities and algebraic manipulation. Key steps include applying the derivative of arccosine and carefully handling the quotient rule for the rational expression. The final result emphasizes the need for meticulous calculations to ensure accuracy in the derivative.
a.mlw.walker
Messages
144
Reaction score
0
Big derivative, just want to make sure I am doing correct thing here.

a is the only changing dimension, r and l are constants

##\theta=\arccos\left(\frac{r^{2}+\left(r+l-a\right)^{2}-l^{2}}{2r\left(r+l-a\right)}\right)##

I want to differentiate ##\frac{d\theta}{da}##

So what I did was using

##\theta=\arccos a##

## cos\theta=a## differentiate this## -sin\theta \frac{d\theta}{da}=1##therefore with trig identities and a rearrange:

##\frac{d\theta}{da}=\frac{-1}{\sqrt{1-a^{2}}}##

where ##a = \left(\frac{r^{2}+\left(r+l-a\right)^{2}-l^{2}}{2r\left(r+l-a\right)}\right)##

So the derivative of theta with respect to a is

##\frac{d \theta}{da}=\frac{-a'} {\sqrt{1-a^2}}##

This involves the quotient rule, and I end up the expression below: I took out a factor of 4 top and bottom of the derivative of a, hence the 3/2 coefficient

##\frac{d\theta}{da}= \frac{ra^2 - (2r^2 - rl )a + (2r^{3}+3lr^{2}##
##+l^{2}r)}{ra^{3}-\frac{3}{2}r^{2}a^{2}+(2r^{3}+3lr^{2}+rl^{2})a-(r^{4}-2r^{3}l-r^{2}l^{2})}##
##\sqrt{1-(\frac{a^{2}-2a(r-l )+(2r^{2}+2rl)}{-2ra + 2r^{2} +2rl})##

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In a nutshell, for the derivative you need to use the following rules, in this order:
  1. Use the chain rule form of the derivative with respect to u of ##\arccos u##, where u is the rational expression in the parentheses. ##\frac d{dx}\left(\arccos(u)\right) = \frac {-1}{\sqrt{1 - u^2}}\frac {du}{dx}##
  2. Use the quotient rule to take the deriviative with respect to a of the rational expression. This will be a little bit messy, but not too bad if you're careful.

In the previous post, the last LaTeX was broken. I attempted to fix it, but gave up.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top