Derivative of (v)^2 with respect to position

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the chain rule in calculus, specifically in the context of physics equations involving velocity and acceleration. The user correctly applies the chain rule to derive the relationship between acceleration (a) and the derivative of velocity squared (v^2) with respect to position (x). The key equations discussed include v = dx/dt and a = dv/dt, leading to the conclusion that a = (1/2)d(v^2)/dx. The conversation confirms that multiple approaches can yield the same result, emphasizing the flexibility of calculus in problem-solving.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically derivatives and the chain rule
  • Familiarity with basic physics concepts such as velocity and acceleration
  • Knowledge of the relationship between position, velocity, and time
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in different contexts, such as implicit differentiation
  • Explore advanced calculus topics, including multivariable calculus and partial derivatives
  • Learn about the physical implications of derivatives in kinematics and dynamics
  • Investigate alternative methods for deriving relationships in physics, such as using graphical analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics and mathematics, educators teaching calculus and physics, and professionals involved in fields requiring a strong understanding of motion and derivatives.

TheWonderer1
Messages
88
Reaction score
1
I forgot where I came across this and why I got so determined to figure it out but I wanted to ask about this d/dx(v^2) business.

My question is to solidify my understanding of the chain rule with physics equations (sorry for crap terminology). Therefore, I know I use it and do the math as
d(v^2)/dv * dv/dx = 2v x dv/dx = 2 dx/dt * dv/dx= 2 dv/dt = 2a. I just sort of do that automatically but I’m unsure of the “why”.

Basically, if possible, could you explain to me the chain rule being used for these sort of equations? I understand the use for something like the derivative of (3x+1)^7 = 21(3x+1)^6.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's easier to see what's going on if you go backwards from what you have. The definitions of velocity and acceleration are
$$v=\frac{dx}{dt}~;~~~a=\frac{dv}{dt}$$
Apply the chain rule
$$a=\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{dv}{dx} \frac{dx}{dt}=v\frac{dv}{dx}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dx}(v^2)$$Does this make sense?
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker, vanhees71 and lekh2003
It is clear. So I think I used the chain rule correctly in my case. I know I got to the right answer just want to be sure my reasoning was on point and I didn’t misuse the chain rule.

Could I have done the chain rule differently? Just trying to get further concrete understanding.
 
TheWonderer1 said:
Could I have done the chain rule differently?
You did do it differently. You started from d(v2)/dx and you showed that it is equal to 2a. I started from a and showed that it is equal to (1/2)d(v2/dx. Both ways are equally correct and lead to the same equation.
 
Oops, to ask my question more explicitly we have two ways are there other ways?
 
TheWonderer1 said:
Oops, to ask my question more explicitly we have two ways are there other ways?
I can't think of any. You have to start from the definition of the acceleration and there is a limited choice of what to do next if you want to introduce the velocity in the expression and use the chain rule.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K